Cancer Research Cancer Epigenetics  Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 49, 88-92, January 1, 1989]
© 1989 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Natsumeda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Natsumeda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, G.

Significance of Purine Salvage in Circumventing the Action of Antimetabolites in Rat Hepatoma Cells1

Yutaka Natsumeda, Tadashi Ikegami2, Edith Olah3 and George Weber4

Laboratory for Experimental Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46223

The flux activities of de novo and salvage purine synthesis were compared in rat hepatoma 3924A cells in various growth phases. The initial rate assays of [14C]adenine, [14C]hypoxanthine, and [14C]guanine incorporation yielded Michaelis-Menten kinetics with Kms of 5, 7, and 7 {varepsilon}M, respectively. After replating plateau phase cells in lag and log phases the activity of purine de novo pathway increased 4.5- to 8-fold with a preferential rise in guanylate synthesis, whereas purine salvage activities increased only 1.6- to 2.1-fold. However, for the syntheses of IMP, AMP, and GMP, the activities of purine salvage pathways were 2- to 7-fold, 5- to 28-fold, and 2- to 32-fold higher than those of the de novo purine pathway. Treatment of cells with acivicin, an inhibitor of the activity of amidophosphoribosyltransferase, phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase, and GMP synthase, inhibited the flux activities of de novo purine, adenylate, and guanylate syntheses to 37, 73, and 3% of the controls and decreased the concentration of GTP to 42%; the concentration of ATP did not change and that of 5-phosphoribosyl 1-pyrophosphate increased 3.1-fold. Under these conditions the activities of salvage synthesis from hypoxanthine and guanine were enhanced 2.5-fold. Treatment of hepatoma cells with IMP dehydrogenase inhibitors, tiazofurin, ribavirin, and 4-carbamoylimidazolium 5-olate, to block de novo guanylate synthesis accelerated the flux activity of guanine salvage pathway. The higher capacity of purine salvage pathway than that of the de novo one and the further rise of the activity in response to the drugs targeted against the de novo pathway highlight the important role salvage synthesis might play in circumventing the impact of antimetabolites of de novo purine synthesis in cancer chemotherapy.

1 Supported by USPHS Outstanding Investigator Grant CA-42510 to G. W.

2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

3 Permanent address: Department of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute of Hungary, Budapest, Hungary.

4 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 7/13/88. Revised 9/22/88. Accepted 9/26/88.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Cancer Research.