Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Susan G. Komen for the Cure-AACR Outstanding Investigator Award for Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

[Cancer Research 49, 3196-3202, June 15, 1989]
© 1989 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hébert, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Birnbaum, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hébert, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Birnbaum, L. S.

Lack of Correlation between Sensitivity to Growth Inhibition and Receptor Number for Transforming Growth Factor ß in Human Squamous Carcinoma Cell Lines

Charles D. Hébert1 and Linda S. Birnbaum

Systemic Toxicology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 [C. D. H., L. S. B.], and Curriculum in Toxicology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27559 [C. D. H.]

Four human squamous carcinoma cell lines, SCC-9, SCC-12F, SCC-15G, and SCC-25, were examined for sensitivity to the growth-inhibitory and differentiation-inducing effects of transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß). None of the four cell lines was induced to differentiate, as measured by staining for keratin and by competence of cells to form cross-linked envelopes, by concentrations of TGF-ß as high as 1000 pM. TGF-ß did not inhibit DNA synthesis or proliferation of SCC-12F cells in monolayer culture. Monolayer growth and DNA synthesis of SCC-15G and SCC-25 cells were markedly inhibited by 10 pM TGF-ß, with maximal inhibition between 10 and 100 pM. Inhibition of SCC-15G cells was apparent as early as 8 h after addition of TGF-ß, but inhibition of SCC-25 cells was not measurable until 2 days. Growth inhibition of SCC-15G cells was completely reversible, whereas inhibition of SCC-25 cells was irreversible. When growth of cells was measured in a defined medium supplemented with 0.5% fetal bovine serum, TGF-ß inhibited both the monolayer and clonal growth of SCC-15G cells. The monolayer growth, but not the clonal growth, of SCC-25 cells was inhibited. Growth of SCC-9 cells in confluent cultures was slightly inhibited by TGF-ß, while growth in subconfluent cultures was unaffected. All four cell lines, when assayed for binding of 125I-labeled TGF-ß, displayed high-affinity (KD = 2–44 pM) binding sites. These sites were present in very low numbers (<2000 sites/cell) in SCC-9, SCC-15G, and SCC-25 cells. SCC-12F cells contained 2000–5500 high-affinity sites/cell. Thus, a lack of sensitivity to growth inhibition by TGF-ß does not necessarily correlate with an inability to bind the growth factor to specific cell surface receptors. The possibility remains that altered sensitivity to TGF-ß may be due to loss of or changes in the relative proportions of the various TGF-ß receptor types. TGF-ß is believed to play a primary role in control of normal cellular growth and differentiation, and the study of cells with defective responses to this growth factor should help to identify some of the critical points within the growth cycle at which malignant cells may escape normal regulatory controls. The differential responses of these four human squamous carcinoma cell lines to TGF-ß should provide a useful model for studying such control mechanisms.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 11/ 7/88. Revised 3/ 1/89. Accepted 3/21/89.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Hayakawa, S. J. Hayes, D. C. Lawe, E. Sudharshan, R. Tuft, K. Fogarty, D. Lambright, and S. Corvera
Structural Basis for Endosomal Targeting by FYVE Domains
J. Biol. Chem., February 13, 2004; 279(7): 5958 - 5966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Cancer Research.