Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 49, 3267-3270, June 15, 1989]
© 1989 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zeller, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lijinsky, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zeller, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lijinsky, W.

Biological Activity of Hydroxylated Chloroethylnitrosoureas

W. J. Zeller, S. Frühauf, G. Chen1, G. Eisenbrand and W. Lijinsky

Institute of Toxicology and Chemotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, 6900 Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany [W. J. Z., S. F., G. C., G. E.], and Frederick Cancer Research Facility, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21701 [W. L.]

1-Nitroso-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3-(2-chloroethyl)urea (Compound I) and 1-nitroso-1-(2-hydroxypropyl)-3-(2-chloroethyl)urea (Compound II) display significantly reduced antitumor activity compared to the corresponding isomeric derivatives 1-nitroso-1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(2-hydroxyethyl) urea (Compound III) and 1-nitroso-1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(2-hydroxypropyl) urea (Compound IV). Their low therapeutic activity is paralleled by low toxicity while mutagenicity and carcinogenicity are high. A comparative investigation of the genotoxicity of Compounds I and III using primary cultures of fetal hamster lung cells revealed an about 14-fold higher rate of DNA single-strand breaks following exposure (100 µM, 1 h) to Compound I as compared to Compound III. The rate of DNA interstrand cross-links, on the other hand, was 11-fold higher following Compound III as compared to Compound I. The results underline that the therapeutic activity of chloroethylnitrosoureas is mainly attributable to their cross-linking potential while induction of DNA single-strand breaks plays a decisive role for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity but appears not to be relevant for antineoplastic effectiveness.

1 Visiting scientist from the Cancer Institute, Sun Yat-sen University of Medical Sciences, 510026 Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Received 7/18/88. Revised 2/24/89. Accepted 3/ 7/89.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Cancer Research.