| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Kami-Ikebukuro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo 170 [S. O., J. M., M. I.]; and Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113 [Y. S.]
We presented a cell kill pharmacodynamic model for cell cycle phasespecific antitumor agents as well as that for cell cycle phase-nonspecific agents. The former was based upon assumptions that a cell population could be divided into a drug-sensitive population having sensitive (or specific) cell cycle phase(s) and a drug-resistant population in resistant cell cycle phases. This model revealed that cell killing action of antitumor agents with sufficient cell cycle phase specificity was time dependent. This time dependence was actually observed with cytosine arabinoside by colony-forming inhibition assays using Chinese hamster V79 cells.
On the other hand, the present analysis indicated that cell killing effects of drugs lacking cell cycle phase specificity are dependent on C x T (concentration-time product). We analyzed cell kill kinetics of cisplatin and showed C x T dependence of cell killing action of the drug using human colon cancer WiDr cells. These results indicate that cell killing action of antitumor agents can be kinetically analyzed in terms of cell cycle phase specificity.
1 This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, and for New Drug Development Research from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan.
2 Present address: Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Shinano-machi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160, Japan.
3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.
Received 12/15/88. Revised 4/10/89. Accepted 4/19/89.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. N. Gardner and M. Fernandes New tools for cancer chemotherapy: computational assistance for tailoring treatments Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2003; 2(10): 1079 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Hassan, E. Jonsson, R. Larsson, and M. O. Karlsson Model for Time Dependency of Cytotoxic Effect of CHS 828 in Vitro Suggests Two Different Mechanisms of Action J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2001; 299(3): 1140 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-L. Li, L. Horn, P. S. Firby, and M. J. Moore Pharmacological Determinants of 9-Aminocamptothecin Cytotoxicity Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2001; 7(1): 168 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Gardner A Mechanistic, Predictive Model of Dose-Response Curves for Cell Cycle Phase-specific and -nonspecific Drugs Cancer Res., March 1, 2000; 60(5): 1417 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kishi, N. Goto, T. Nakamura, and T. Ueda Evaluation of Cell-killing Effects of 1-{beta}-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine and Daunorubicin by a New Computer-controlled in Vitro Pharmacokinetic Simulation System Cancer Res., June 1, 1999; 59(11): 2629 - 2634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |