Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 49, 4526-4530, August 15, 1989]
© 1989 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hickson, I. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hickson, I. D.

Isolation of Two Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Mutants Hypersensitive to Topoisomerase II Inhibitors and Cross-Resistant to Peroxides1

Stella M. Davies, Sally L. Davies2, Adrian L. Harris2 and Ian D. Hickson2,3,

Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom

We have isolated two Chinese hamster ovary cell lines, designated ADR-4 and ADR-5, which exhibit hypersensitivity to intercalating agents and epipodophyllotoxins. These drugs are thought to exert their cytotoxicity via an interaction with the enzyme topoisomerase II. However, there is no apparent change in the level or catalytic activity of topoisomerase II in the mutant cells. Drug sensitivity does not appear to be due to increased drug transport because accumulation of radiolabeled actinomycin D is similar in mutant and wild-type cells. Both mutant cell lines show enhanced resistance to hydrogen peroxide and to organic peroxides. ADR-4 cells show a degree of temperature sensitivity. ADR-5 cells show mild sensitivity to UV irradiation. Neither cell line shows significant sensitivity to mono- or bifunctional alkylating agents, ionizing radiation, or bleomycin.

Cell fusion studies indicate that the phenotype of each mutant cell line is recessive and that the mutants represent two different genetic complementation groups. These studies also indicate that ADR-4 and ADR-5 are in different complementation groups from the previously described Adriamycin-sensitive mutant, ADR-1. These results indicate that sensitivity to topoisomerase II inhibitors can result from abnormalities in several genes. These drug-sensitive mutants may be useful for studying the mechanisms of cell killing by topoisomerase II inhibitors, free radicals, and heat.

1 This work was supported by North of England Children's Cancer Research and the North of England Cancer Research Campaign. S. M. D. is a Medical Research Council Training Fellow.

2 Present address: Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 2/ 9/89. Revised 5/ 1/89. Accepted 5/ 9/89.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Cancer Research.