Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 49, 4729-4733, September 1, 1989]
© 1989 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yin, M.-b.
Right arrow Articles by Rustum, Y. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yin, M.-b.
Right arrow Articles by Rustum, Y. M.

Mechanisms of the in Vivo Resistance to Adriamycin and Modulation by Calcium Channel Blockers in Mice1

Ming-biao Yin2, Issam Bankusli and Youcef M. Rustum3

Grace Cancer Drug Cencer, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263

A sensitive fluorometric assay using Hoechst 33258 and a modified alkaline elution procedure were used to quantitate DNA single-strand breaks following an in vivo drug treatment of mice bearing P-388/S and P-388/R cells. After an i.p. treatment of mice with 1 to 20 mg/kg Adriamycin (DOX), the following differences between sensitive and resistant P-388 cells were observed: (a) at 2 h following drug treatment the net intracellular accumulation of Adriamycin in sensitive cells was 2- to 3-fold higher than resistant cells at all doses tested; (b) utilizing a therapeutic dose of DOX (10 mg/kg), the amount of single-strand breaks of DNA in sensitive and resistant cells was significantly different, K x 102 = 13.6 ± 1.1 (SD) versus 3.6 ± 0.9, respectively; (c) the 10 and 50% lethal doses for verapamil (VEP) were 10 and 23 mg/kg and for a tiapamil analogue, N-(3,4-dimethoxyphenethyl)-N-methyl-2-(2-naphthyl)-m-dith

iane-2-propylamine hydrochloride (DMDP), were 107 and 126 mg/kg, respectively; (d) while the in vivo intracellular accumulation and retention of DOX in sensitive cells were not affected by DMDP or VEP treatment, complete restoration of DOX accumulation and retention was achieved in resistant cells treated with well-tolerated doses of DMDP of 30 and 60 mg/kg. In contrast, utilizing the optimally tolerated dose of VEP (5 mg/kg), only partial restoration of DOX accumulation and retention in resistant cells was achieved; (e) DMDP or VEP did not alter the high level of DNA single-strand breaks induced by DOX in sensitive cells; in resistant cells, however, an increase in single-strand breaks of DNA was observed following treatment with DOX in combination with DMDP and to a lesser extent with VEP; and (f) the rapid DNA repair in resistant cells was inhibited by DMDP but not by VEP. These data demonstrate that DMDP but not VEP can effectively restore the in vivo intracellular accumulation of DOX in resistant cells at achievable nontoxic plasma concentrations.

Previous studies have demonstrated that the in vitro intracellular concentrations and retention of DOX by resistant cells can be restored by VEP. The results reported herein demonstrated that similar effects can be achieved, however, in vivo by using a new calcium channel blocker, DMDP, with less in vivo toxicity and more efficacy than VEP in restoring cellular drug concentration, retention, and repair of DNA damage in the resistant cells.

1 This work was supported in part by Grants CA18420, CA21071, and CA24538.

2 Visiting scientist from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 9/30/88. Revised 4/ 3/89. Accepted 5/30/89.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. W. Loe, R. G. Deeley, and S. P. C. Cole
Verapamil Stimulates Glutathione Transport by the 190-kDa Multidrug Resistance Protein 1 (MRP1)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2000; 293(2): 530 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Cancer Research.