Cancer Research Landon Prizes for Basic and Translational Cancer Research  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 49, 5586-5590, October 15, 1989]
© 1989 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Leopold, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Leopold, W. R.

Sequence and Schedule-dependent Synergy of Trimetrexate in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil in Vitro and in Mice

William L. Elliott1, Curtis T. Howard, Donald J. Dykes and Wilbur R. Leopold

Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research Division, Warner-Lambert and Co. [W. L. E., C. T. H., W. R. L.], Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, and Southern Research Institute [D. J. D.], Birmingham, Alabama 35255

The purpose of this study was to determine the conditions for optimum synergistic efficacy of the two-drug combination of trimetrexate and 5-fluorouracil. Synergistic cell killing of Chinese hamster ovary cells in these clonogenic survival assays was observed only when the cells had been exposed to trimetrexate (25 µM) for 2 to 4 h prior to 5-fluorouracil exposure (either 125 or 250 µM). The schedule dependence of the observed synergy in vitro was closely linked to trimetrexate-induced changes in cellular 5-phosphoribosyl 1-pyrophosphate (PRPP) pools. Exposure to 25 µM trimetrexate induced increases in PRPP pools to 398% and 761% of control values at 2 and 4 h, respectively. Methotrexate (20 µM) also increased Chinese hamster ovary cell PRPP content in a time-dependent fashion to values of 280 and 511% of control after 2 and 4 h of drug exposure. Previous in vivo studies demonstrated a modest degree of therapeutic synergy between trimetrexate and 5-fluorouracil against P388 leukemia. Our in vitro results suggested that the degree of synergy seen in vivo could be increased with appropriate schedule changes. Mice were implanted i.p. with 106 P388 leukemia cells on Day 0 and were treated with trimetrexate (every 3 h for eight injections; Days 1, 5, and 9) and 5-fluorouracil (Days 1, 5, and 9) as single agents or in combination on one of two schedules; 5-fluorouracil was administered with either the first or the last of the eight trimetrexate doses on Days 1, 5, and 9. Both treatment regimens demonstrated therapeutic synergy but, as predicted from the in vitro data, the "5-fluorouracil last" was superior to the "5-fluorouracil first" sequence. Treatment with the optimal doses on the "5-fluorouracil last" sequence (trimetrexate, 31; 5-fluorouracil, 33 mg/kg/injection) produced an increased life span of 183% and a net reduction in tumor cell burden of 6.7 logs compared with a 111% increased life span (net reduction in tumor burden of 2.6 logs) produced by the most active of the single agents, 5-fluorouracil. Thus the efficacy of the combination of trimetrexate with 5-fluorouracil was sequence and time dependent both in vitro and in vivo. The synergy, observed in vitro and probably in vivo, was linked to a trimetrexate-induced elevation of intracellular PRPP, thus facilitating the production of 5-fluoropyrimidine nucleotides. These data are similar to the sequence and schedule dependency of the methotrexate/5-fluorouracil combination with important differences. In particular, the rapid loss of synergy observed upon removal of trimetrexate from the culture medium and the associated decrease in intracellular PRPP levels are not observed with methotrexate treatment and indicate that the combination of trimetrexate and 5-fluorouracil cannot be equated with the clinical combination of methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research Division, Warner-Lambert Co., 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105.

Received 4/ 6/89. Revised 7/ 6/89. Accepted 7/20/89.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. G. Amado, L. S. Rosen, J. R. Hecht, L.-S. Lin, and P. J. Rosen
Low-dose trimetrexate glucuronate and protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion in previously untreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2002; 13(4): 582 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Cancer Research.