Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 49, 5638-5643, October 15, 1989]
© 1989 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alabaster, O.
Right arrow Articles by Jahangeer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alabaster, O.
Right arrow Articles by Jahangeer, S.

Influence of Microenvironmental pH on Adriamycin Resistance1

Oliver Alabaster2, Tina Woods, Vilma Ortiz-Sanchez and Saleem Jahangeer

Division of Hematology and Oncology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037

Resistance to Adriamycin (ADR) is frequently dependent upon enhanced efflux associated with the expression of the MDR1-encoded P membrane glycoprotein. Since enhanced expression of the MDR1 gene in ADR-resistant cells may be the result of spontaneous genetic mutation or amplification, it is presumed to be relatively stable and unalterable. Yet, reducing ADR efflux could increase sensitivity, and has been attempted using calcium channel blockers and other drugs. However, since the tumor cell microenvironment varies with respect to pH because of differences in vascularization, oxygenation, and metabolite clearance, the possibility exists that these factors could influence drug transport and the critical biochemical pathways which determine cytotoxicity, even in resistant cells.

Using flow cytometric analysis of ADR fluorescence, the influx and efflux of 10 µM ADR dissolved in MES buffer (pH 6.5) and 4-(2-hydroxyethylene)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid buffer (pH 7.5 and 8.5) was measured in sensitive P388 and resistant P388/R84 cells in vitro. Substantially enhanced uptake of ADR was detected at alkaline pH in both cell populations, while the proportion of ADR-positive cells and the level of ADR uptake was decreased at lower pH. Acidification reduced ADR efflux, whereas alkalinization increased efflux when the uptake pH was 6.5 or 7.5. At uptake pH 8.5, the pH of the external buffer had little effect, even in resistant cells. In resistant cells in an alkaline microenvironment, ADR transport and retention were superior to that observed in sensitive cells in an acidic microenvironment. No differences were observed in ADR transport when the transmembrane pH gradient was equilibrated. These observations are especially relevant to the effect of ADR on tumor cell subpopulations that are acidic, and in which drug diffusion is inefficient. Efforts to alkalinize tumor cells prior to ADR therapy might reduce ADR resistance, even of genetic origin.

1 Supported in part by NIH Grant RO1-CA32756.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Hematology and Oncology, Suite 421, Ross Hall, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037.

Received 12/14/88. Revised 6/29/89. Accepted 7/13/89.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Cancer Research.