Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 49, 6615-6620, December 1, 1989]
© 1989 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adams, D. J.

In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Assay for Cancer Drug Development: Application to Crisnatol, a New DNA Intercalator

David J. Adams1

Tumor Biology Section, Division of Cell Biology, Burroughs Wellcome Company, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

A microtiter pharmacodynamic assay is described that evaluates antitumor activity in vitro within a matrix of extracellular drug concentrations (C) and exposure times (T). The results were analyzed according to the pharmacodynamic principle: Cn x T = k, where n is the concentration coefficient and k is the drug exposure constant. This assay was used to characterize the antitumor activity of crisnatol (BW A770U), a member of the new arylmethylaminopropanediol class of DNA intercalators, in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. The assay showed that drug action was a function of k, the extracellular drug exposure. Crisnatol had no effect at k < 30 (n ≤ 1); was growth inhibitory at k = 30–1000 (n = 1), cytostatic at 1500, and cytotoxic at k > 2000 µMn-h (n = 2). These effects were directly related to increasing cellular retention of crisnatol. The threshold for growth inhibition was 0.02 fmol/cell, while cytoreduction required over 1 fmol/cell. The assay also yielded concentration-time curves of the form C = (k/T)1/n at specific specific surviving fractions, which were useful in selecting exposure conditions for further studies and emphasized the impact of exposure time on crisnatol activity. The hyperbolic nature of these curves suggested a unique parameter for comparing antitumor agents: the minimum C x T. This parameter represents the minimum exposure conditions required for a specified level of antitumor activity and accounts for differences in concentration coefficients among agents. The pharmacodynamic assay for crisnatol illustrates the importance of both concentration and exposure time in drug action and suggests a pharmacodynamic basis for comparing antitumor agents that conform to the Cn x T = k principle. Such agents include doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, etoposide, and tamoxifen. Analysis of these agents in the MCF-7 model shows that the minimum C x T parameter gives a relative cytotoxicity profile distinct from that found with the standard IC90 end point. This disparity was also seen in another, less differentiated breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231), and in normal human skin fibroblasts. Regardless of the end point, the in vitro cytotoxicity of crisnatol compares favorably with that of some clinically useful antitumor agents.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Tumor Biology Section, Division of Cell Biology, Burroughs Wellcome Co., 3030 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

Received 1/ 5/89. Revised 7/ 5/89. Accepted 8/31/89.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. E. Eliaz, S. Nir, C. Marty, and F. C. Szoka Jr.
Determination and Modeling of Kinetics of Cancer Cell Killing by Doxorubicin and Doxorubicin Encapsulated in Targeted Liposomes
Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 64(2): 711 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. N. Gardner
A Mechanistic, Predictive Model of Dose-Response Curves for Cell Cycle Phase-specific and -nonspecific Drugs
Cancer Res., March 1, 2000; 60(5): 1417 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. A. Villalona-Calero, T. Petit, J. Kuhn, P. Cobb, M. Kraynak, S. G. Eckhardt, R. Drengler, C. Simmons, P. Santabarbara, D. D. Von Hoff, et al.
A Phase I and Pharmacological Study of Protracted Infusions of Crisnatol Mesylate in Patients with Solid Malignancies
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 1999; 5(11): 3369 - 3378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Cancer Research.