Cancer Research Landon Prizes for Basic and Translational Cancer Research  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 49, 7041-7044, December 15, 1989]
© 1989 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baba, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bull, J. M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baba, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bull, J. M. C.

Increased Therapeutic Gain of Combined cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum(II) and Whole Body Hyperthermia Therapy by Optimal Heat/Drug Scheduling1

Hideo Baba2, Zahid H. Siddik, Frederick R. Strebel, Gaye N. Jenkins and Joan M. C. Bull3

University of Texas, Medical School at Houston, Department of Internal Medicine [H. B., F. R. S., G. N. J., J. M. C. B.] and M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology [Z. H. S.], Houston, Texas 77030

To maximize therapeutic gain, the timing sequence of whole body hyperthermia (WBH) and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (DDP) was examined. Normal tissue injury as well as growth of a s.c. transplanted fibrosarcoma were measured in F344 rats treated with variable schedules of WBH and DDP. Simultaneous application of DDP (2 mg/kg i.v.) with WBH (120 min at 41.5°C) resulted in severe renal injury, body weight loss, and mortality; while sequential use of the modalities caused minimal to no toxicity. DDP or WBH alone produced only minimal tumor growth delay, whereas supraadditive antitumor effects occurred with all tested schedules of DDP combined with WBH, regardless of sequence or interval between the two modalities. We designated the ratio of antitumor effect to nephrotoxicity as specific therapeutic efficacy (STE). DDP given simultaneously with WBH produced the lowest STE (0.6–1.2), which was less than or equal to either DDP (STE = 1.2) or WBH (STE = 1.5) alone. On the other hand, schedules of DDP prior to and after WBH resulted in a STE of 1.8–3.0, a supraadditive effect. These results indicate that an optimal scheduling of DDP with WBH significantly improves therapeutic gain by reducing normal tissue injury while maintaining enhanced antitumor activity.

1 Supported by National Cancer Institute Grant ROI-CA-43090.

2 On leave from Department of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812, Japan.

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at University of Texas, Health Science Center at Houston, Division of Oncology/Hematology, P. O. Box 20708, Houston, TX 77225.

Received 5/24/89. Revised 9/ 5/89. Accepted 9/13/89.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Cancer Research.