Cancer Research AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 49, 1178-1181, March 1, 1989]
© 1989 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanida, N.
Right arrow Articles by Narisawa, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanida, N.
Right arrow Articles by Narisawa, T.

Effects of Oral Administration of Sulfolithocholic Acid Disodium Salt and Lithocholic Acid Sodium Salt on N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced Colonic Tumorigenesis in Conventional Rats

Noritoshi Tanida1, Kenji Sawada, Akihiko Kawaura, Makoto Oda, Takashi Shimoyama and Tomio Narisawa

Department of Internal Medicine 4, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawacho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663 [N. T., K. S., A. K., M. O., T. S.], and Department of Surgery, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1 Hondo 1-chome, Akita 010 [T. N.], Japan

Effects of p.o. administration of sulfolithocholic acid disodium salt (SLCNa) and lithocholic acid sodium salt (LCNa) on N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced colonic tumorigenesis were studied in conventional rats. Female F344 rats received either 0.5 ml of distilled water (DW) alone or DW containing 2.5 mg of MNU twice in 1 wk intrarectally. Then rats were fed freely on a basal diet (PCE-2) or PCE-2 containing LCNa or SLCNa (both at 0.5 mmol/100 g of PCE-2) for 40 wk. Thus, 6 groups were completed: MNU + PCE-2 (n = 30); MNU + LCNa (n = 29); MNU + SLCNa (n = 22); DW + PCE-2 (n = 17); DW + LCNa (n = 20); and DW + SLCNa (n = 19). Numbers of rats bearing colonic tumor were 3 (10%) in MNU + PCE-2, 2 (7%) in MNU + LCNa, and 8 (36%) in MNU + SLCNa group (uncorrected x2 = 9.35 among the 3 groups), but none in those groups without MNU. Total fecal bile acids in the rats given bile salts showed about 2-fold increase compared with those without bile salts. Fecal bile acid profiles between the LCNa and SLCNa groups were indistinguishable except for a slight increase of sulfolithocholic acid in the SLCNa groups. These results indicated that p.o. administration of SLCNa but not LCNa promoted MNU-induced colonic tumorigenesis in conventional rats. Fecal bile acid profiles did not support the higher tumor incidence in the MNU + SLCNa group compared with the MNU + LCNa group, which suggested that an unrecognized mechanism probably relating to desulfation of SLCNa was involved in this phenomenon.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 6/13/88. Revised 10/17/88. Accepted 11/22/88.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Cancer Research.