Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 49, 1676-1681, April 1, 1989]
© 1989 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kovatch, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kovatch, R. M.

Modification of Transplacental Tumorigenesis by 3-Methylcholanthrene in Mice by Genotype at the Ah Locus and Pretreatment with ß-Naphthoflavone

Lucy M. Anderson1, Ann B. Jones, Charles W. Riggs and Robert M. Kovatch

Laboratory of Comparative Carcinogenesis, Division of Cancer Etiology, National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research Facility [L. M. A., A. B. J.]; Data Management Services, Frederick, Maryland 21701 [C. W. R.]; and Pathology Associates, Ijamsville, Maryland 21754 [R. M. K.]

Transplacental lung and liver tumorigenesis in the mouse by 3-methylcholanthrene (MC) was assessed as a function of inducibility of MC metabolism in fetus and in mother, and of pretreatment of the mothers with a noncarcinogenic inducer, ß-naphthoflavone (ßNF). Pregnant (C57BL/6 x DBA/2)F1 females (genotype AhbAhd, inducer responsive) mated to DBA/2 males received 45 or 100 mg/kg MC on gestation day 17, and DBA/2 females (genotype AhdAhd, nonresponsive) mated to F1 males were given 5 or 30 mg MC/kg. These crosses generated both responsive and nonresponsive offspring. Phenotype and tumor incidences were determined at 13 months of age. The transplacental action of MC was dose dependent and resulted in more lung and liver tumors in induction-responsive offspring than in nonresponsive littermates in most comparisons. ßNF alone did not result in increased numbers of tumors. Significant, complex effects were seen when the mothers were pretreated with ßNF (150 mg/kg) on gestation day 15, before MC on day 17. The ßNF pretreatment protected the fetuses of the F1 mothers: there was a significant overall 30 to 50% reduction in numbers of lung and liver tumors. The greatest effect was seen in the induction-responsive males, who experienced a 50% reduction in both incidence and multiplicity of lung tumors after 100 mg MC/kg, compared with males exposed to MC only. By contrast, ßNF pretreatment of DBA mothers had no general effect but rather potentiated the action of the 5 mg MC/kg dose on multiplicity of lung tumors in inducible males, causing a significant 4-fold increase. It also caused a 60% increase in inducible male liver tumor multiplicity when given before the 30 mg MC/kg dose. Thus, ßNF pretreatment was protective when the mother was inducible, especially in the inducible fetuses of such a mother, but when the mother was noninducible the ßNF pretreatment had no effect in some situations and potentiated the action of the carcinogen in others, mainly in inducible fetuses. These results underscore the fact that induced maternal and fetal metabolism contribute to risk of transplacental tumorigenesis by MC in qualitatively opposite ways.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at the Laboratory of Comparative Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research Facility, Building 538, Room 205E, Frederick, MD 21701.

Received 7/26/88. Revised 12/28/88. Accepted 1/ 5/89.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. H. Conney
Enzyme Induction and Dietary Chemicals as Approaches to Cancer Chemoprevention: The Seventh DeWitt S. Goodman Lecture
Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 63(21): 7005 - 7031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association for Cancer Research.