| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
National Cancer Institute, Navy Medical Oncology Branch, Naval Hospital, Bethesda 20814-5101 [C-M. T., A. F. G., J. L. M., B. S. K.], Biostatistics and Data Management Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda 20892 [D. J. V., S. M. S.], Chemical Engineering Section, Division of Research Services, NIH, Bethesda 20892 [R. L. D.], and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda 20814 [B. S. K.], Maryland
Claims of synergy between etoposide and cisplatin have been based upon preclinical in vivo murine P388 models or upon human clinical trials in tumors such as lung cancer. Such in vivo studies are useful in exploring therapeutic synergy, i.e., an improved therapeutic strategy. The term "synergy" in this context is sometimes, however, taken to imply greater than additive kill of tumor cells. Unfortunately, it is virtually impossible to document supraadditive tumor cell kill in vivo, since in vivo curves of therapeutic effect are not linear and drugs are therefore not additive with themselves. Therapeutic synergy may, in fact, occur when two drugs are merely additive (or even antagonistic) with regard to cytotoxicity if the drugs have nonoverlapping host toxicity.
The demonstration of true supraadditive cell kill would imply an interaction of the two agents at a cellular level and would have profound implications for biochemical studies. In order to determine whether the reported therapeutic synergy of etoposide and cisplatin is due, in part, to supraadditive cell kill, we used an in vitro tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity (MTT assay) and an isobologram analysis to test combinations of the two drugs against four human small cell and four human non-small cell lung carcinoma lines. Using a rigorous test for in vitro synergy, we could not establish a greater than additive cytotoxic effect on our cell lines. It thus appears that the clinical synergy between etoposide and cisplatin is not due to a supraadditive effect at the cellular level. Our results have implications for a variety of fields in which claims of "synergy" often appear.
1 The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Navy or the Department of Defense. This work was supported, in part, by a grant from the Harold G. Mathers Foundation.
2 Present address: Chest Department; Veterans General Hospital; Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.
Received 10/ 5/88. Revised 1/31/89. Accepted 2/ 2/89.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. D. Mayer, T. O. Harasym, P. G. Tardi, N. L. Harasym, C. R. Shew, S. A. Johnstone, E. C. Ramsay, M. B. Bally, and A. S. Janoff Ratiometric dosing of anticancer drug combinations: Controlling drug ratios after systemic administration regulates therapeutic activity in tumor-bearing mice. Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2006; 5(7): 1854 - 1863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dowlati, D. Nethery, and J. A. Kern Combined inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor and JAK/STAT pathways results in greater growth inhibition in vitro than single agent therapy Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2004; 3(4): 459 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. Vasilevskaya, T. V. Rakitina, and P. J. O'Dwyer Quantitative Effects on c-Jun N-Terminal Protein Kinase Signaling Determine Synergistic Interaction of Cisplatin and 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin in Colon Cancer Cell Lines Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2004; 65(1): 235 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. V. Rakitina, I. A. Vasilevskaya, and P. J. O'Dwyer Additive Interaction of Oxaliplatin and 17-Allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in Colon Cancer Cell Lines Results from Inhibition of Nuclear Factor {kappa}B Signaling Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8600 - 8605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. Vasilevskaya, T. V. Rakitina, and P. J. O'Dwyer Geldanamycin and its 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxy Analogue Antagonize the Action of Cisplatin in Human Colon Adenocarcinoma Cells: Differential Caspase Activation as a Basis for Interaction Cancer Res., June 15, 2003; 63(12): 3241 - 3246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hida, K.-i. Kozaki, H. Muramatsu, A. Masuda, S. Shimizu, T. Mitsudomi, T. Sugiura, M. Ogawa, and T. Takahashi Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor Induces Apoptosis and Enhances Cytotoxicity of Various Anticancer Agents in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Lines Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2000; 6(5): 2006 - 2011. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Peterson, J. M. Lu, Z.-w. Gu, J.-G. Shiah, K. Lythgoe, A. C. Peterson, R. C. Straight, and J. Kopee Isobolographic Assessment of the Interaction Between Adriamycin and Photodynamic Therapy With Meso-Chlorin E6 Monoethylene Diamine in Human Epithelial Overian Carcinoma (OVCAR-3) In Vitro Reproductive Sciences, November 1, 1995; 2(6): 772 - 777. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |