Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 50, 2872-2876, May 15, 1990]
© 1990 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Begleiter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Leith, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Begleiter, A.
Right arrow Articles by Leith, M. K.

Activity of Quinone Alkylating Agents in Quinone-resistant Cells1

Asher Begleiter2 and Marsha K. Leith

Departments of Internal Medicine [A. B., M. K. L.] and Pharmacology and Therapeutics [A. B.], University of Manitoba, and Manitoba Institute of Cell Biology [A. B., M. K. L.], 100 Olivia Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0V9, Canada

The role of the quinone group in the antitumor activity of quinone alkylating agents, such as mitomycin C and 2,5-diaziridinyl-3,5-bis(carboethoxyamino)-1,4-benzoquinone, is still uncertain. The quinone group may contribute to antitumor activity by inducing DNA strand breaks through the formation of free radicals and/or by influencing the alkylating activity of the quinone alkylators. The cytotoxic activity and DNA damage produced by the model quinone alkylating agents, benzoquinone mustard and benzoquinone dimustard, were compared in L5178Y murine lymphoblasts sensitive and resistant to the model quinone antitumor agent, hydrolyzed benzoquinone mustard. The resistant cell lines, L5178Y/HBM2 and L5178Y/HBM10, have increased concentrations of glutathione and elevated catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione S-transferase, and DT-diaphorase activity. L5178Y/HBM2 and L5178Y/HBM10 cells were 7.4- and 8.5-fold less sensitive to benzoquinone mustard and 1.7- and 4.3-fold less sensitive to benzoquinone dimustard, respectively, compared with sensitive cells, but showed no resistance to the non-quinone alkylating agent, aniline mustard. The formation of DNA double strand breaks by benzoquinone mustard was reduced by 2- and 8-fold in L5178Y/HBM2 and L5178Y/HBM10 cells, respectively, while double strand break formation by benzoquinone dimustard was reduced only in the L5178Y/HBM10 cells. The number of DNA-DNA cross-links produced by benzoquinone mustard was 3- and 6-fold lower, and the number produced by benzoquinone dimustard was 35% and 2-fold lower in L5178Y/HBM2 and L5178Y/HBM10 cells, respectively, compared with L5178Y parental cells. In contrast, cross-linking by aniline mustard was unchanged in sensitive and resistant cells. Dicoumarol, an inhibitor of DT-diaphorase, increased the cytotoxic activity of both benzoquinone mustard and benzoquinone dimustard in L5178Y/HBM10 cells. This study provides evidence that elevated DT-diaphorase activity in the resistant cells contributes to resistance to benzoquinone mustard and benzoquinone dimustard, possibly by decreasing the formation of the semiquinone intermediates of these agents. The altered reduction of the quinone groups in the resistant cells may be responsible for the decreased DNA-DNA cross-linking and lowered induction of DNA strand breaks by the quinone alkylating agents. These findings demonstrate that the quinone group can modulate the activity of quinone alkylating agents. The study also suggests that the semiquinone intermediates of benzoquinone mustard and benzoquinone dimustard may be the active alkylating species of these two agents.

1 Supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Manitoba Institute of Cell Biology, 100 Olivia Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0V9, Canada.

Received 4/26/88. Revised 12/27/89.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Sanceau, S. Truchet, and B. Bauvois
Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Silencing by RNA Interference Triggers the Migratory-adhesive Switch in Ewing's Sarcoma Cells
J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2003; 278(38): 36537 - 36546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Cancer Research.