Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 50, 2936-2942, May 15, 1990]
© 1990 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demignot, S.
Right arrow Articles by Baldwin, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Demignot, S.
Right arrow Articles by Baldwin, R. W.

Comparison of Biodistribution of 791T/36 Monoclonal Antibody and Its Fab/c Fragment in BALB/c Mice and Nude Mice Bearing Human Tumor Xenografts1

Sylvie Demignot2, Malcolm V. Pimm3 and Robert W. Baldwin

Cancer Research Campaign Laboratories, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

Fab/c fragments, purified from pepsin digest of mouse IgG2b monoclonal antibody (MoAb) 791T/36, consist of one Fab arm and the intact Fc portion. Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies in BALB/c mice of radioiodine-labeled 791T/36 MoAb and its Fab/c fragments showed that, due to the presence of the Fc portion, the Fab/c fragment has the same catabolic rate as whole antibody (T1/2 = 64 h). Due to its lower molecular weight (105,000), the Fab/c fragment extravasated more quickly and to a greater extent than whole MoAb in organs in which the vascular endothelium was fenestrated or continuous. In organs in which the vascular endothelium is sinusoidal, such as in liver and spleen, their diffusion capacities were identical. Therefore, Fab/c fragments reconcile advantages of the intact antibody molecule (slow catabolic rate) and Fab or F(ab)2 fragments (increased extravascular diffusion), features required to improve targeting to solid tumors. Data from biodistribution studies in nude mice bearing subcutaneous 791T tumor (antigen positive) and Colo205 tumor (antigen negative) contralaterally showed important differences in the behavior of whole MoAb and Fab/c fragment: (a) Whole MoAb was cleared more rapidly from the body and from the blood than Fab/c fragment; (b) The MoAb was taken up by the spleen (tissue to blood ratio >1 from 12 h after injection over the 3 days of the experiment) and the liver (0.6), whereas Fab/c fragment tissue to blood ratios were only slightly increased (0.34 and 0.35) compared to control nude mice (0.25 and 0.28) for the spleen and liver, respectively, 3 days after injection. Since both MoAb and Fab/c fragment bear the Fc portion, these data suggest that the reputed "nonspecific uptake" of antibodies due to the Fc portion could be an Fc-mediated specific uptake, e.g., uptake of immune complexes; (c) The tumor to blood ratios were 1.7 and 1.2 for MoAb and Fab/c fragment, respectively, from 24 h throughout the experiment, whereas the percentage of injected dose (% of ID) present/g of 791T tumor was at any time greater for Fab/c fragment (8% maximum of ID) than for MoAb (5% of ID). These results were not expected in view of the low immunoreactivity in vitro of Fab/c fragments compared to whole antibody. It is suggested that the distribution and the catabolic rate of whole antibody and its Fab/c fragment at the tumor level are modulated by their respective valency and immunoreactivity for the target cell.

1 This work was supported by the Cancer Research Campaign, London, United Kingdom. S.Demignot was supported by a European Economic Community grant (Biotechnology Program).

2 Present address: Laboratoire de Pharmacologie Cellulaire, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, 15 Rue de l'Ecole de Medecine, 75006, Paris, France.

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Cancer Research Campaign Laboratories, Nottingham University, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.

Received 9/25/89. Revised 1/30/90.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. De Lorenzo, R. Cozzolino, A. Carpentieri, P. Pucci, P. Laccetti, and G. D'Alessio
Biological properties of a human compact anti-ErbB2 antibody
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2005; 26(11): 1890 - 1895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Cancer Research.