| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
-Emitter 211At and 131I as Labels of a Monoclonal Antibody and F(ab')2 Fragment1Departments of Radiology [P. K. G., C. L. H., M. R. Z.] and Pathology [M. R. Z.], Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Because it decays by the emission of short-range, high-energy
-particles, the radiohalogen 211At might be a particularly useful nuclide for some types of radioimmunotherapy. However, no suitable
-emitting nuclide of astatine exists whch would permit either imaging prior to therapy to obtain radiation dosimetry estimates or performing experiments in paired-label format. Since iodine is the halogen above astatine in the periodic table, we investigated whether the in vivo distribution of 131I could be used to mimic the biodistribution of 211At. In this study, the N-succinimidyl 3-(trialkylstannyl)benzoate method was used to label C110 IgG, an antibody directed against carcinoembryonic antigen, and its (Fab')2 fragment with 211At and 131I. Paired-label experiments were performed in normal mice comparing the tissue distribution of 211At-versus 131I-labeled C110 IgG and F(ab')2 as well as [211At]astatide versus [131I]iodide and m-[211At]astatobenzoic acid versus m-[131I]iodobenzoic acid, potential catabolites of proteins radiohalogenated via the N-succinimidyl 3-(trialkylstannyl)benzoate method. With the exception of thyroid, retention of astatide in tissues was higher than that of iodide; and, with the halobenzoic acids, uptake of 211At was higher than 131I in thyroid, stomach, and spleen. Use of the N-succinimidyl 3-(trialkylstannyl)benzoate method to label C110 IgG with 211At and 131I resulted in similar distributions of the two nuclides. In contrast, loss of 211At from the F(ab')2 fragment was considerably more rapid than 131I, suggesting that different astatination methods may be required for use with F(ab')2 fragments.
1 Supported by National Cancer Institute Grants CA 42324, NS 20023, and CA 14236 and by Grant DE-FG05-89ER60789 from the Department of Energy.
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Radiology, Box 3808, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Received 11/27/89.
Revised 2/14/90.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Lindegren, S. Frost, T. Back, E. Haglund, J. Elgqvist, and H. Jensen Direct Procedure for the Production of 211At-Labeled Antibodies with an {varepsilon}-Lysyl-3-(Trimethylstannyl)Benzamide Immunoconjugate J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1537 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Welch Potential and Pitfalls of Therapy with {alpha}-Particles J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1254 - 1255. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Foulon, C. J. Reist, D. D. Bigner, and M. R. Zalutsky Radioiodination via D-Amino Acid Peptide Enhances Cellular Retention and Tumor Xenograft Targeting of an Internalizing Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Variant III Monoclonal Antibody Cancer Res., August 1, 2000; 60(16): 4453 - 4460. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |