Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 50, 5767-5772, September 15, 1990]
© 1990 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vuist, W. M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Melief, C. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vuist, W. M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Melief, C. J. M.

Two Distinct Mechanisms of Antitumor Activity Mediated by the Combination of Interleukin 2 and Monoclonal Antibodies

Wim M. J. Vuist1, Frank v. Buitenen, Annemarie Hekman and Cornelis J. M. Melief2

Division of Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Huis, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Previously we described a human B-lymphoma xenotransplantation model in which the immunotherapeutic activity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), directed against human B-cell antigens, can be studied. An anti-CD19 mAb of IgG2a subclass was therapeutically active by itself in this model, and its efficacy was increased by simultaneous administration of recombinant interleukin 2 (rIL-2). Immunotherapy with IgG1 or IgG2b isotype variants of an anti-CD19 mAb was ineffective if given alone. We now show that the combination of these ineffective isotype variants with rIL-2 results in significant antitumor effects, although IgG2a anti-CD19 mAb in combination with rIL-2 was therapeutically more active.

In vitro studies of the effector mechanisms possibly involved in these treatment modalities indicate that the antitumor activity of IgG1 or IgG2b anti-CD19 mAbs in combination with rIL-2 may be mediated by rIL-2-induced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxic activity of lymphocytes. The antitumor effect of IgG2a anti-CD19 mAb in combination with rIL-2 may be mediated not only by rIL-2-induced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxic activity of lymphocytes but also by IgG2a-restricted antitumor activity of monocytes/macrophages. These results may explain the greater in vivo efficacy of treatment with rIL-2 and IgG2a subclass mAb versus treatment with rIL-2 and IgG1 or IgG2b subclass mAbs.

1 Supported by Grant NKI-84-14 from the Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds (The Netherlands Cancer Foundation).

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 3/28/90. Accepted 6/14/90.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Yazawa, Y. Hamaguchi, J. C. Poe, and T. F. Tedder
Immunotherapy using unconjugated CD19 monoclonal antibodies in animal models for B lymphocyte malignancies and autoimmune disease
PNAS, October 18, 2005; 102(42): 15178 - 15183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Cancer Research.