Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 50, 5813-5818, September 15, 1990]
© 1990 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fox, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, P. J.

Long-Term Inhibition of DNA Synthesis and the Persistence of Trapped Topoisomerase II Complexes in Determining the Toxicity of the Antitumor DNA Intercalators mAMSA and Mitoxantrone

Mary E. Fox and Paul J. Smith1

Medical Research Council Clinical Oncology and Radiotherapeutics Unit, Medical Research Council Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QH, United Kingdom

The cytotoxic actions of several classes of antitumor DNA intercalators are thought to result from some disturbance to DNA metabolism following trapping of the nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase II as a covalent complex on DNA. Here we have studied topoisomerase II trapping and DNA synthesis patterns in relation to the acute cytotoxic actions of 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide (mAMSA) or mitoxantrone on SV40 transformed human fibroblasts. These two DNA intercalators differed significantly in their cytotoxic potential, mitoxantrone being 24-fold more toxic than mAMSA when assayed by the inhibition of clonogenicity. Although both drugs induced G2 delay at cytotoxic concentrations, mAMSA-treated cells recovered normal cell cycle phase distributions within 24 h of removal of drug, while mitoxantrone-treated cells continued to accumulate in G2 up to 48 h following drug treatment with evidence of complete inhibition of entry into mitosis. Compared with mAMSA, mitoxantrone showed a similar capacity to induce cleavable complexes in cellular DNA, and only a 2-fold greater ability to inhibit DNA synthesis. Within a 4-h posttreatment period, mAMSA-treated cells recovered normal rates of DNA synthesis, whereas a continued depression of DNA synthesis was observed in mitoxantrone-treated cells. The recovery patterns of DNA synthesis correlated with the rapid disappearance of mAMSA-induced complexes (<27% lesions remaining 2 h after drug removal) and the persistence of mitoxantrone-induced complexes during a 4-h posttreatment period. This difference in complex longevity was observed in other human transformed fibroblast cell lines irrespective of differences in the absolute levels of complexes induced by either agent. We suggest that the results provide evidence that DNA intercalators may differ in the forms of complexes induced and that the comparatively high cytotoxicity of mitoxantrone relates to the ability of the drug to trap topoisomerase II complexes in a form which effects a long-term inhibition of DNA replication and G2 traverse.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 2/22/90. Accepted 6/ 1/90.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M. Debouverie, L. Taillandier, S. Pittion-Vouyovitch, S. Louis, and H. Vespignani
Clinical follow-up of 304 patients with multiple sclerosis three years after mitoxantrone treatment
Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2007; 13(5): 626 - 631.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M Debouverie, N Vandenberghe, S P Morrissey, R Anxionnat, S Pittion-Vouyovitch, H Vespignani, and G Edan
Predictive parameters of mitoxantrone effectiveness in the treatment of multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2004; 10(4): 407 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
K. Pors, Z. Paniwnyk, P. Teesdale-Spittle, J. A. Plumb, E. Willmore, C. A. Austin, and L. H. Patterson
Alchemix: A Novel Alkylating Anthraquinone with Potent Activity against Anthracycline- and Cisplatin-resistant Ovarian Cancer
Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2003; 2(7): 607 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
A. Buschini, P. Poli, and C. Rossi
Saccharomyces cerevisiae as an eukaryotic cell model to assess cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three anticancer anthraquinones
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2003; 18(1): 25 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. R. Hande
The Importance of Drug Scheduling in Cancer Chemotherapy: Etoposide as an Example
Oncologist, August 1, 1996; 1(4): 234 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
K. Hande
The importance of drug scheduling in cancer chemotherapy: etoposide as an example
Stem Cells, January 1, 1996; 14(1): 18 - 24.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1990 by the American Association for Cancer Research.