This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moy, B. C. Articles by Bhuyan, B. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moy, B. C. Articles by Bhuyan, B. K.

Characterization of B16 Melanoma Cells Resistant to the CC-1065 Analogue U-71,184

Department of Cancer and Developmental Biology, The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001-0199

U-71,184 is a CC-1065 analogue which is highly cytotoxic in vitro and has a broad spectrum of antitumor activity in vivo. Against B16 cells, U-71,184 was 8-fold and 253-fold more potent than Actinomycin D and Adriamycin, respectively. U-71,184 killed 90% of B16 cells at 0.01 ng/ml levels of drug in the medium, which was equivalent to an intracellular concentration of about 8 pg/10⁶ cell (= 2 x 10^-8 pmol/cell). A B16 cell line resistant to U-71,184 developed after 3 months of in vitro exposure to gradually increasing concentrations of the drug. The sensitive and resistant cell lines were cloned and a B16/R clone was selected which was 60 to 100 times more resistant to U-71,184 than the cloned sensitive parent (B16/S). Cells grown in the absence of U-71,184 for 2 months retained resistance to the drug.

B16/R was slightly cross-resistant only to Adriamycin but not to Actinomycin D, vinblastine, or colchicine. Among alkylating agents, it was slightly cross-resistant to Melphalan but not to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea or cisplatin. B16/R did not overexpress mdr mRNA. Therefore, this cell line does not exhibit the multidrug-resistant phenotype. Most karyotypes of B16/R had a marker chromosome which carried an aberrantly staining region apparently containing repetitive replication of the same segment. Resistance can be partly accounted for by the approximately 10-fold lesser uptake of [³H]-U-71,184 in B16/R, as compared to B16/S.

B16/R was cross-resistant in varying degrees to several other CC-1065 analogues. The ratio of the 50% lethal dose of U-71,184 for B16/R, as compared to B16/S, was about 60 (i.e., R/S = 60). In comparison, the following compounds had an R/S ratio of less than 20 (i.e., modest level of cross-resistance to U-71,184): U-68,819, U-73,975, U-75,500, U-75,559, and CC-1065. In contrast, the following compounds had an R/S ratio greater than 20 (i.e., highly cross-resistant to U-71,184): U-71,184 analogues U-71,185, U-73,903, and U-75,012; U-73,975 analogues U-75,613, U-75,032, and U-73,896; and CC-1065 enantiomer U-76,915. We cannot yet explain the difference in the level of cross-resistance between these compounds in vitro.

B16/S and B16/R cells were tumorigenic in mice and B16/R was resistant to U-71,184 in vivo. There was no clear indication of cross-resistance of B16/R in vivo to Adriamycin, Actinomycin D, cisplatin, or Melphalan. However, U-73,975, a compound with modest cross-resistance in vitro, was significantly cross-resistant in vivo.

¹ Present address: Abbott Laboratories, Diagnostics Division, North Chicago, IL 60064.

² To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at The Upjohn Company, Cancer and Infectious Diseases Research, 301 Henrietta Street, Kalamazoo, MI 49001.

Received 6/30/89. Revised 12/14/89.