Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 51, 3119-3130, June 15, 1991]
© 1991 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, F.
Right arrow Articles by Jain, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, F.
Right arrow Articles by Jain, R. K.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Two-Step Approaches Using Bifunctional and Enzyme-conjugated Antibodies1

Fan Yuan, Laurence T. Baxter and Rakesh K. Jain2

Tumor Microcirculation Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-3890

Bifunctional antibodies (BFA) and enzyme-conjugated antibodies (ECA) can be used to preferentially deliver a hapten or drug to tumor sites for diagnosis and therapy. We present here a simple pharmacokinetic model for the above two systems by considering only two compartments, the plasma and tumor. The models predict that the longer the time delay between the BFA and hapten or between the ECA and prodrug injections, the higher the tumor:plasma concentration ratio of the hapten or drug. In addition, multiple injections of the hapten or prodrug is predicted to give a more uniform concentration of the hapten or drug in both the tumor and plasma than bolus injection. We suggest that, initially, the most effective dose of BFA should be selected and then the hapten concentration chosen accordingly. The decrease of the ECA injection dose would increase the tumor:plasma concentration ratio of the drug and yet decrease the tumor concentration of the drug. In clinical application of the ECA system, consideration of ECA dose should be balanced between the tumor concentration and the tumor:plasma concentration ratio of the drug. The dose of the prodrug injection is suggested to be equal to the required toxic concentration of the drug in the tumor. There are several ways to improve the tumor:plasma concentration ratio of the hapten or drug, such as changing the binding kinetics of the antibody to tumor or the hapten to BFA and removing the antibody from the plasma before the injection of the hapten or prodrug. One notable difference between the BFA and ECA approaches is that there is an upper limit for maximum hapten concentration in the former, and hence, from the point of drug delivery alone the latter approach is presumably superior. The limitations of the models and therapeutic implications are also discussed.

1 Supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA-36902 and CA-49792) and National Science Foundation (CBT-88-16062) and an Alexander von Humboldt Senior Scientist Award (1990–1991) to R. K. J.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Tumor Microcirculation Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890.

Received 12/26/90. Accepted 4/ 3/91.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
L. Fang and D. Sun
Predictive Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Antibody-Directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy
Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1153 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. K. Sharma, R. B. Pedley, J. Bhatia, G. M. Boxer, E. El-Emir, U. Qureshi, B. Tolner, H. Lowe, N. P. Michael, N. Minton, et al.
Sustained Tumor Regression of Human Colorectal Cancer Xenografts Using a Multifunctional Mannosylated Fusion Protein in Antibody-Directed Enzyme Prodrug Therapy
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 11(2): 814 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
Y. Wang, J. K. Hu, A. Krol, Y.-P. Li, C.-Y. Li, and F. Yuan
Systemic dissemination of viral vectors during intratumoral injection
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2003; 2(11): 1233 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. M. Sharkey, W. J. McBride, H. Karacay, K. Chang, G. L. Griffiths, H. J. Hansen, and D. M. Goldenberg
A Universal Pretargeting System for Cancer Detection and Therapy Using Bispecific Antibody
Cancer Res., January 15, 2003; 63(2): 354 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. A. Cavacini, M. Duval, J. P. Eder, and M. R. Posner
Evidence of Determinant Spreading in the Antibody Responses to Prostate Cell Surface Antigens in Patients Immunized with Prostate-specific Antigen
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 8(2): 368 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Krol, J. Maresca, M. W. Dewhirst, and F. Yuan
Available Volume Fraction of Macromolecules in the Extravascular Space of a Fibrosarcoma: Implications for Drug Delivery
Cancer Res., August 1, 1999; 59(16): 4136 - 4141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Shabat, C. Rader, B. List, R. A. Lerner, and C. F. Barbas III
Multiple event activation of a generic prodrug trigger by antibody catalysis
PNAS, June 8, 1999; 96(12): 6925 - 6930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1991 by the American Association for Cancer Research.