| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Experimental and Chemical Endocrinology [P. G. K., A. G-M., J. J. T. M. H., C. B. M. K., T. J. B.] and Department of Medicine [P. G. K., L. V. A. M. B.], Division of Endocrinology, University Hospital of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
A total of 725 human primary breast tumor biopsy samples were analyzed for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) content, using a multiple-point EGFR assay standardized in accordance with the recommendations of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Receptor Study Group.
After the establishment of a lower cell membrane protein threshold of 0.2 mg of membrane protein per ml of assay buffer, the results of 27% (194 samples) of the EGFR determinations were excluded from the study because of insufficient assay membrane protein content. Of the remaining 531 breast tumor biopsy samples, 57% (302 samples) were shown to be EGFR positive by Scatchard analysis, with a median value of 40 fmol/mg of membrane protein.
Of the breast tumor biopsy samples, 72% (380 samples) were estrogen receptor (ER) positive, and 65% (344 samples) were progesterone receptor (PgR) positive. EGFR positivity was found in 46% (173 of 380) of ER-positive and in 85% (129 of 151) of ER-negative breast tumor biopsy samples (P < 0.0001), as well as in 49% (168 of 344) of PgR-positive and in 72% (134 of 186) of PgR-negative breast tumor biopsy samples (P < 0.0001). Mean EGFR levels in ER-positive breast tumor biopsy samples were lower than they were in ER-negative ones, 40 ± 31 (SD) against 72 ± 55 fmol/mg of membrane protein (P < 0.0001). Similarly, mean EGFR levels in PgR-positive breast tumor biopsy samples were lower than they were in PgR-negative ones, 41 ± 29 against 70 ± 56 fmol/mg of membrane protein (P < 0.0001). Both EGFR positivity and EGFR levels decreased with increasing steroid hormone receptor levels. A multivariate analysis showed only ER to be independently associated with EGFR.
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Experimental and Chemical Endocrinology, University Hospital of Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Received 3/11/91. Accepted 6/17/91.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Boerner, M. A. Gibson, E. M. Fox, E. D. Posner, S. J. Parsons, C. M. Silva, and M. A. Shupnik Estrogen Negatively Regulates Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF)-Mediated Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 Signaling in Human EGF Family Receptor-Overexpressing Breast Cancer Cells Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2005; 19(11): 2660 - 2670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yang, S. M. Edgerton, S. D. Kosanke, T. L. Mason, K. M. Alvarez, N. Liu, R. T. Chatterton, B. Liu, Q. Wang, A. Kim, et al. Hormonal and Dietary Modulation of Mammary Carcinogenesis in Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus-c-erbB-2 Transgenic Mice Cancer Res., May 15, 2003; 63(10): 2425 - 2433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Thor, S. M. Edgerton, S. Liu, D. H. Moore II, and D. J. Kwiatkowski Gelsolin as a Negative Prognostic Factor and Effector of Motility in erbB-2-positive Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-positive Breast Cancers Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2001; 7(8): 2415 - 2424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |