Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  EMT and Cancer Progression and Treatment
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 51, 4581-4587, September 1, 1991]
© 1991 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Leopold, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Leopold, W. R., III

In Vivo and in Vitro Evaluation of the Alkylating Agent Carmethizole

William L. Elliott1, David W. Fry, Wayne K. Anderson, James M. Nelson, Kenneth E. Hook, Peggy A. Hawkins and W. R. Leopold, III

Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research Division, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 [W. L. E., D. W. F., J. M. N., K. E. H., P. A. H., W. R. L.] and College of Pharmacy, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260 [W. K. A.]

Carmethizole, a novel bis-carbamate alkylating agent, was evaluated in vitro for potential mechanisms of interaction with DNA and in vivo for spectrum and degree of antitumor activity. In vitro, the concentration of carmethizole required to produce a 50% reduction in clonogenic cell survival was identical in O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase-positive and -negative human cell lines. The CHO cell line UV4, hypersensitive to mono- and bifunctional alkylating agents, was 37-fold more sensitive to carmethizole than normal cells. The UV5 cell line, which is not hypersensitive to cross-linkers, was 13-fold more sensitive to carmethizole than normal cells. Alkaline elution studies in L1210 cells exposed to carmethizole showed the presence of DNA-protein and DNA-DNA cross-links but not DNA strand breaks. These data suggested that the interaction of carmethizole with DNA produces monoadducts, DNA-protein, and DNA-DNA interstrand cross-links at several sites.

In vivo, carmethizole was not cross-resistant with 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea or Cytoxan as determined by testing against P388 leukemias resistant to the latter 2 agents. Carmethizole activity was similar to that of melphalan across the murine solid tumor panel, which consisted of B16 melanoma; colon adenocarcinomas 11a, 26, and 36; and the KHT sarcoma. Carmethizole, Cytoxan, and melphalan were all active and had comparable activity against the HCT-8 and MX-1 human tumor xenografts. The in vivo spectrum of activity and efficacy of carmethizole was similar to that of melphalan.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research Division, Warner-Lambert Co., 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2430.

Received 1/28/91. Accepted 6/13/91.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1991 by the American Association for Cancer Research.