Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 51, 780-784, February 1, 1991]
© 1991 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teicher, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teicher, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frei, E., III

Lonidamine as a Modulator of Alkylating Agent Activity in Vitro and in Vivo1

Beverly A. Teicher2, Terence S. Herman, Sylvia A. Holden, Ron Epelbaum, Shi-de Liu and Emil Frei, III

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute [B. A. T., T. S. H., S. A. H., R. E., S-d. L., E. F.] and Joint Center for Radiation Therapy [B. A. T., T. S. H.], Boston, Massachusetts 02115

We are searching for relatively nontoxic compounds that can positively modulate the efficacy of antitumor alkylating agents. Lonidamine inhibits cellular energy metabolism and could potentially increase damage by alkylating agents if cellular defenses are energy requiring. Exposure of cells to lonidamine (500 µM) for 2 h under hypoxic conditions followed by 1-h exposures to lonidamine plus alkylating agents under normally oxygenated conditions in vitro significantly increased the cell kill achieved by cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP) approximately 5-fold and by D-tetraplatin approximately 10-fold at 90% inhibitory concentration in MCF-7/CDDP (CDDP-resistant) cells. Carboplatin cytotoxicity, however, was little changed. In the MCF-7 parent cell line, treatment with lonidamine increased CDDP cytotoxicity by approximately 10-fold, D-tetraplatin by approximately 10-fold, and carboplatin by approximately 8-fold at the 90% inhibitory concentration. For L-phenylalanine mustard (melphalan), N,N',N''-triethylenethiophosphoramide (thiotepa), and N,N'-bis(2-chloroethyl)-N-nitrosourea, little resistance was evident in the MCF-7/CDDP lines compared with the parent line. Treatment with lonidamine increased the cytotoxicity of each drug by 1.5- to 3-fold in both cell lines. When exposure to lonidamine was extended to 24 h before and 12 h after drug exposure in MCF-7 normally oxygenated cultures, CDDP (250 µM) cytotoxicity was increased by approximately 100-fold, but melphalan cytotoxicity was increased only 2- to 3-fold over the concentration range tested. In the FSaIIC murine fibrosarcoma tumor system, five i.p. injections of 50 mg/kg of lonidamine over 36 h increased the tumor cell kill by CDDP and carboplatin approximately 2- to 3-fold over the dose range tested when the platinum complexes were given i.p. immediately after the third lonidamine injection. When cyclophosphamide and thiotepa were given in the same schedule, 10-fold increases in tumor cell killing were evident on tumor excision assay over the dosage ranges. The increase in bone marrow toxicity caused by lonidamine in addition to the alkylating agents was less than for tumor cells. Finally, in the EMT6 murine mammary carcinoma, use of lonidamine at 500 mg/kg twice daily along with CDDP, carboplatin, thiotepa, and cyclophosphamide significantly increased tumor growth delays by approximately 1.6- to 3.0-fold. The results suggest that lonidamine can positively modulate antitumor alkylating agent cytotoxicity and may be a clinically useful adjunctive therapy with these drugs.

1 This work was supported by a grant from DeSanctis Consultants, Montreal, Canada; National Cancer Institute Grant 1P01-CA38493; and a grant from the Mathers Foundation.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 8/14/90. Accepted 11/ 9/90.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1991 by the American Association for Cancer Research.