Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 51, 1177-1184, February 15, 1991]
© 1991 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bols, B. L. M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Simons, J. W. I. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bols, B. L. M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Simons, J. W. I. M.

Immortalization of Syrian Hamster Embryo Cells Is in Itself a Multistep Event1

Bart L. M. C. Bols, Jolanda M. Naaktgeboren and Johannes W. I. M. Simons2

Department of Radiation Genetics and Chemical Mutagenesis, State University of Leiden, P. O. Box 9503, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

The hypothesis that induction of immortalization of rodent cells follows one-hit kinetics was tested by the determination of frequencies of immortalization of Syrian hamster embryo cells after treatment with benzo(a)pyrene, X-rays, or ethylnitrosourea. Contrary to expectation, immortalization did not occur in a single step. Full immortalization appeared to be a process which required at least three steps: extension of life span (step 1), increase in cloning efficiency (step 2), and increase in growth rate (step 3). These three steps occur in this fixed sequence. The first step appears to be induced by the carcinogenic treatment, while the two other steps occur spontaneously in the progeny of cells which underwent the first step. The frequency of induction of the first step is in the order of magnitude of mutation induction, which suggests that mutation in one allele of a limited number of loci is sufficient to initiate the process of immortalization. However, the spontaneous frequency of immortalization is below 2.4 x 10-9/cell/generation, which appears to be too low for a spontaneous mutation frequency. The frequencies/cell/generation of the second and the third step are in the order of magnitude of spontaneous mutation frequencies.

1 The research was supported by the Dutch Cancer Foundation, Grant IKW 87–4, by the J. A. Cohen Institute for Radiopathology and Radiation Protection, and by Contract B-16-E-141-NL and EV4V-0047-NL of the Association between the European Community with the University of Leiden.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 3/19/90. Accepted 11/13/90.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1991 by the American Association for Cancer Research.