Cancer Research AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 51, 1619-1626, March 15, 1991]
© 1991 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ong, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mattes, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ong, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Mattes, M. J.

Galactose-conjugated Antibodies in Cancer Therapy: Properties and Principles of Action1

Gaik Lin Ong, David Ettenson, Robert M. Sharkey, Alexander Marks, Reuben Baumal, David M. Goldenberg and M. Jules Mattes2

Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey 07103 [G. L. O., R. M. S., D. M. G., M. J. M.], and The Hospital for Sick Children [D. E., R. B.], and Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto [A. M.], Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8

Galactose conjugation of antibodies causes them to be recognized by the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor and therefore cleared very rapidly from the blood. In these investigations, some effector functions of galactose-conjugated antibodies were assayed, and several applications to experimental tumors in vivo were demonstrated. Galactose conjugation did not interfere with two antibody functions in addition to antigen binding, namely complement-mediated cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. This conjugation procedure was originally developed for its potential use in localized immunotherapy, such as i.p. Injection of galactose-antibody conjugates i.p. demonstrated, more conclusively than other methods that have been used, that the presence of ascites causes prolonged retention of antibody in the peritoneal cavity and that this effect is correlated with the volume of ascites present. In mice bearing i.p. tumor xenografts, i.p. injection of galactose-antibody conjugates resulted in high tumor/nontumor ratios at 28 h after antibody injection, with values of 40:1, 43:1, 77:1, and 11:1 for the blood, kidney, lung, and spleen, respectively, although the ratio was only 4:1 for the liver. Control experiments demonstrated that i.p. injection of unconjugated antibody or a galactose-conjugated nonreactive antibody produced much lower tumor/nontumor ratios.

In investigations of possible systemic application of galactose-antibody conjugates, we found that injection of large amounts of an inhibitor that binds competitively to the hepatic receptor, asialo-bovine submaxillary mucin, can block clearance of galactose-conjugated antibodies for 2–3 days. In this way, high blood levels of antibody can be maintained for 2–3 days, thus allowing penetration and binding to solid tumors, followed by very rapid blood clearance. With this approach, using a human carcinoma growing s.c. in nude mice, high tumor/nontumor ratios were obtained 4 days after injection, with mean values of 43:1, 18:1, 17:1, and 15:1 for the blood, kidney, lung, and spleen, respectively, although the ratio for the liver was only 1.7:1. The blood level at this time was 0.04 ± 0.02% (SD) of the injected dose/g, while the tumor level was 1.69 ± 1.29% of the injected dose/g. In conclusion, galactose-conjugated antibodies appear to have diverse applications in regional or systemic immunotherapy.

1 This work was supported in part by grants CA-48779, CA-39841, and RR-05903 from the NIH and by a grant from the National Cancer Institute of Canada.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, 1 Bruce Street, Newark, NJ 07103.

Received 8/10/90. Accepted 1/ 8/91.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. M. Sharkey, H. Karacay, T. M. Cardillo, C.-H. Chang, W. J. McBride, E. A. Rossi, I. D. Horak, and D. M. Goldenberg
Improving the Delivery of Radionuclides for Imaging and Therapy of Cancer Using Pretargeting Methods
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7109s - 7121s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1991 by the American Association for Cancer Research.