Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Joint Metastasis Research Society-AACR Conference on Metastasis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

[Cancer Research 51, 1793-1797, April 1, 1991]
© 1991 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amos, C. I.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amos, C. I.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, E. L.

Familiality of Breast Cancer and Socioeconomic Status in Blacks1

Christopher I. Amos2, Alisa M. Goldstein and Emily L. Harris

Family Studies Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [C. I. A., A. M. G.], and Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 [E. L. H.]

Familial patterns of the occurrence of breast cancer were studied in a population-based case-control series of black women from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone study. The risks of breast cancer among relatives of breast cancer cases were compared to those of controls who were matched for age and locale. Using the term "proband" to indicate either case or control status, significant predictors of risk to the relatives of probands included case/control status of the proband and the number of years of education completed by the proband. Genetic segregation analysis of the case families using external risks generated from SEER data indicated that the familial aggregation was consistent with Mendelian recessive transmission of a single major gene. The use of internally estimated risks, which are much less stable than the SEER risks, no longer permitted discrimination among the major locus models examined. To avoid possible reporting bias, we also performed segregation analysis on families of probands who had completed at least 12 years of education. The results from this analysis reflected the results from the entire data.

1 The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study was supported by Interagency Agreement 3-Y01-8-1037 between the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the NIH, and the Department of Health and Human Services, with additional support from the National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services.

This study was conducted in collaboration with the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Group of the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, which includes the following individuals: George L. Rubin (principal investigator); Phyllis A. Wingo (project director); and Nancy C. Lee, Michele G. Mandel, and Herbert B. Peterson (project associates). Principal investigators at data collection centers: Raymond Greenberg (Atlanta, GA); J. Wister Meigs, W. Douglas Thompson (Connecticut); G. Marie Swanson (Detroit, MI); Elaine Smith (Iowa); Charles Key, Dorothy Pathak (New Mexico); Donald Austin (San Francisco, CA); David Thomas (Seattle, WA); Joseph Lyon, Dee West (Utah). Principal investigators for pathology review: Fred Gorstein, Robert McDivitt, Stanley J. Robboy. Project consultants: Lonnie Burnett, Robert Hoover, Peter M. Layde, Howard W. Ory, James J. Schlesselman, David Schottenfeld, Bruce Stadel, Linda A. Webster, and Colin White. Pathology consultants: Walter Bauer, William Christopherson, Deborah Gersell, Robert Kurman, Allen Paris, and Frank Vellios.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Family Studies Section, National Cancer Institute, Suite 439, Executive Plaza North, Bethesda, MD 20892.

Received 10/ 2/90. Accepted 1/21/91.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. S. Simon, J. F. Korczak, C. L. Yee, K. E. Malone, G. Ursin, L. Bernstein, J. A. McDonald, D. Deapen, B. L. Strom, M. F. Press, et al.
Breast Cancer Risk Estimates for Relatives of White and African American Women With Breast Cancer in the Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 24(16): 2498 - 2504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
V. L. Champion, C. S. Skinner, U. Menon, S. Rawl, R. B. Giesler, P. Monahan, and J. Daggy
A Breast Cancer Fear Scale: Psychometric Development
J Health Psychol, November 1, 2004; 9(6): 753 - 762.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1991 by the American Association for Cancer Research.