Cancer Research AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 52, 3534-3538, July 1, 1992]
© 1992 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohsaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohsaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, B. E.

Antitumor Activity of Magainin Analogues against Human Lung Cancer Cell Lines1

Yoshinobu Ohsaki, Adi F. Gazdar, Hao-Chia Chen and Bruce E. Johnson2

National Cancer Institute-Navy Medical Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland 20889-5105 [Y. O., A. F. G., B. E. J.], and Endocrinology and Reproduction Research Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [H-C. C]

Magainin 1 and magainin 2, originally isolated from African clawed frog Xenopus laevis skin, inhibit the growth of bacteria and fungi. Synthetic magainin A (MAG A) and magainin G (MAG G) are more potent against bacteria and protozoa. In order to determine the antitumor activity of these analogues, we have tested these two analogues against six small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines NCI-H82, NCI-H526, NCI-H678, NCI-H735, NCI-H841, and NCI-H889, which were known to differ by more than 10-fold in their sensitivity to different chemotherapeutic agents, and four normal human fibroblast cell lines. Semiautomated 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays of the six SCLC cell lines revealed average concentrations producing 50% inhibition (IC50) values of 2.6 µM (range, 0.49–9.30 µM) for cisplatin, 2.5 µM (range, 0.39–6.00 µM) for etoposide, and 138.8 nM (range, 55.0–450.0 nM) for doxorubicin. The average IC50 of MAG A was 8.64 µM (range, 6.23–11.7 µM) and that of MAG G was 8.82 µM (range, 4.44–12.5 µM) against the SCLC cell lines. Despite a 10-fold difference in sensitivity to standard chemotherapeutic agents, the IC50 of MAG A and MAG G differs by <3-fold. The average IC50 against four normal human fibroblast cell lines was 21.1 µM (range, 12.7–25.6 µM) for MAG A and 29.2 µM (range, 21.3–34.8 µM) for MAG G. Combined exposure to the IC50 concentration of MAG A or MAG G plus IC50 of etoposide or cisplatin decreased the percentage of surviving SCLC cells to 29.0% (range, 26.1–31.7%). MAG A or MAG G had an additive effect when used with standard chemotherapeutic agents. These data suggest that MAG A and MAG G have in vitro antitumor activity against SCLC cell lines.

1 This work was supported in part by a generous grant from the Schissler Foundation. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Navy or the Department of Defense. This is a U.S. government work. There are no restrictions on its use.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at National Cancer Institute-Navy Medical Oncology Branch, National Naval Medical Center, Bldg. 8, Rm. 5101, Bethesda, MD 20889-5105.

Received 10/24/91. Accepted 4/24/92.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
W. S. Yang, S.-O Park, A-R. Yoon, J. Y. Yoo, M. K. Kim, C.-O. Yun, and C.-W. Kim
Suicide cancer gene therapy using pore-forming toxin, streptolysin O.
Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2006; 5(6): 1610 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. Papo, D. Seger, A. Makovitzki, V. Kalchenko, Z. Eshhar, H. Degani, and Y. Shai
Inhibition of tumor growth and elimination of multiple metastases in human prostate and breast xenografts by systemic inoculation of a host defense-like lytic Peptide.
Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 66(10): 5371 - 5378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. V. Lemeshko, M. Arias, and S. Orduz
Mitochondria Permeabilization by a Novel Polycation Peptide BTM-P1
J. Biol. Chem., April 22, 2005; 280(16): 15579 - 15586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. M. Ellerby, S. Lee, L. M. Ellerby, S. Chen, T. Kiyota, G. del Rio, G. Sugihara, Y. Sun, D. E. Bredesen, W. Arap, et al.
An Artificially Designed Pore-forming Protein with Anti-tumor Effects
J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2003; 278(37): 35311 - 35316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Takeshima, A. Chikushi, K.-K. Lee, S. Yonehara, and K. Matsuzaki
Translocation of Analogues of the Antimicrobial Peptides Magainin and Buforin across Human Cell Membranes
J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(2): 1310 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Risso, E. Braidot, M. C. Sordano, A. Vianello, F. Macri, B. Skerlavaj, M. Zanetti, R. Gennaro, and P. Bernardi
BMAP-28, an Antibiotic Peptide of Innate Immunity, Induces Cell Death through Opening of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2002; 22(6): 1926 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. C. B. Vogt and B. Bechinger
The Interactions of Histidine-containing Amphipathic Helical Peptide Antibiotics with Lipid Bilayers. THE EFFECTS OF CHARGES AND pH
J. Biol. Chem., October 8, 1999; 274(41): 29115 - 29121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Cancer Research.