Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 52, 3593-3597, July 1, 1992]
© 1992 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yung, B. Y-M.
Right arrow Articles by Hui, E. K-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yung, B. Y-M.
Right arrow Articles by Hui, E. K-W.

Interaction of Antileukemia Agents Adriamycin and Daunomycin with Sphinganine on the Differentiation of Human Leukemia Cell Line HL-601

Benjamin Y-M. Yung2, K. J. Luo and Eric K-W. Hui

Cancer Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Chang Gung Medical College, 259 Wen-Hwa 1st Rd, Kwei-San, Tao-Yuan 33332, Taiwan, Republic of China

A slight induction of granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 cells occurred after treatment with antileukemia chemotherapeutic agents Adriamycin (ADM) and daunomycin (DM). Addition of an inhibitor (sphinganine, SP) of protein kinase C (PKC) enhanced 2–4-fold the ADM or DM-induced differentiation. This phenomenon was accompanied by a slightly augmented antiproliferative effect. The enhancement of differentiation induction in these treatments seemed to be absolute, since the combination treatment (ADM-SP or DM-SP) showed about 2.5–3.6 times as many differentiated cells as the treatment with the anticancer drugs ADM or DM alone. Further characterization of the interaction of ADM and DM with SP on differentiation of HL-60 cells was carried out. Whereas the addition of SP in the fresh medium after the removal of ADM or DM (0.5 h treatment) enhanced the induction of differentiation, a pretreatment (24 h) of the cells with SP followed by continuous exposure to ADM or DM did not show such enhancement effect. The addition of SP at as late as 48 h after the administration of ADM or DM potentiated the induction of differentiation to the same extent as in the simultaneous combination of ADM-SP or DM-SP. Similar results were obtained in the experiments with another PKC inhibitor, staurosporine. These results indicated that inhibition of PKC activities may play an important role in the later events during the induction of differentiation elicited by ADM or DM. The use of the antileukemia drugs ADM and DM in combination with an inhibition of PKC activity results in enhancement of induction of differentiation and suggests a new strategy and a promising approach to the treatment of leukemia.

1 This work was supported by Chang Gung Research Grant CMRP 275 and National Science Council (R.O.C.) Grants NSC80-0412-B182-41 and NSC81-0412-B182-5.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 1/13/92. Accepted 4/22/92.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Cancer Research.