| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Previous studies have shown that both transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) and cyclic AMP (cAMP) inhibit hepatocyte DNA synthesis. While cAMP (in addition to being stimulatory in G0/early G1) exerts its inhibition on hepatocytes late in G1, the point where TGF-ß inhibits has not been precisely defined. We have now examined further the inhibitory effects of cAMP and TGF-ß1 on DNA synthesis in primary rat hepatocyte cultures and, in particular, tried to determine where in the prereplicative period the cells are sensitive to these agents. Although a transient exposure to TGF-ß1 (but not glucagon) during the first hours of the cell culturing led to inhibition of DNA synthesis, the cells were more sensitive at a point late in G1, where they also were inhibited by cAMP. Thus, exposure to TGF-ß1, glucagon, or the cAMP analogue 8-chlorophenylthio-cAMP at a time when there was a continuous recruitment of cells to S phase strongly decreased the rate of S-phase entry. For both TGF-ß1 and cAMP the inhibition was established within 12 h, the lag time being indistinguishable for the two agents. No evidence was found for a synergism between TGF-ß1 and cAMP. Treatment with TGF-ß1 did not detectably alter basal or glucagon-stimulated cAMP concentrations. The results suggest that in hepatocytes there is a process immediately before the G1/S border which is sensitive to both TGF-ß1 and cAMP and which appears to represent a major point of inhibition.
1 Supported in part by grants from the Norwegian Council for Science and the Humanities and the Nordic Insulin Fund.
2 G. H. T. is a Research Fellow of the Norwegian Cancer Society. To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1057 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo 3, Norway.
3 Present address: Laboratory of Experimental Carcinogenesis, Division of Cancer Etiology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Received 1/21/92. Accepted 4/23/92.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P Starkel, L Lambotte, C Sempoux, C De Saeger, A Saliez, D Maiter, and Y Horsmans After portal branch ligation in the rat, cellular proliferation in associated with selective induction of c-Ha-ras, p53, cyclin E, and Cdk2 Gut, July 1, 2001; 49(1): 119 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lambotte, A. Saliez, S. Triest, E. M. Tagliaferri, A. P. Barker, and A. G. Baranski Control of rate and extent of the proliferative response after partial hepatectomy Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 1997; 273(4): G905 - G912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Weglarz and E. P. Sandgren Timing of hepatocyte entry into DNA synthesis after partial hepatectomy is cell autonomous PNAS, November 7, 2000; 97(23): 12595 - 12600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |