Cancer Research AACR Membership  Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 52, 4106-4112, August 1, 1992]
© 1992 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pavlik, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by van Nagell, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pavlik, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by van Nagell, J. R., Jr.

Resistance to Tamoxifen with Persisting Sensitivity to Estrogen: Possible Mediation by Excessive Antiestrogen Binding Site Activity1

Edward J. Pavlik2, Katherine Nelson, Suseela Srinivasan, Deborah E. Powell, Daniel E. Kenady, Paul D. DePriest, Holly H. Gallion and John R. van Nagell, Jr.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky 40536

The growth of a large proportion of estrogen receptor-positive breast tumors is stimulated by estrogen and can often be controlled through antiestrogen therapy. Resistance to antiestrogen (AE) therapy can occur while tumors retain the expression of estrogen receptors (ERc) and remain functionally responsive to estrogens. The ability of specific antiestrogen binding sites (AEBS) to prevent AE from interacting with ERc has been examined as a possible mechanism through which this appropriation of AE could interfere with antiestrogen action. Comparisons were performed between uterine preparations where ERc activity exceeded AEBS binding and liver preparations where AEBS binding predominated. Identical estimates of ERc activity were obtained in uterine preparations using either [3H]estradiol or [3H]-4OH-tamoxifen and radioinert diethylstilbestrol ({alpha},{alpha}'-diethyl-4,4'-stilbenediol) to estimate nonspecific binding. AEBS binding was observed only when [3H]-4OH-tamoxifen was used, while binding to Type II sites was resolved only with [3H]estradiol. When excess AEBS activity predominated, analyses with radiolabeled estrogen and antiestrogen present simultaneously showed that virtually all of the antagonist was bound to AEBS with little of the antagonist available to associate with ERc. In an effort to relate these observations to AE resistance per se, ERc and AEBS were measured in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells (ERc-positive, responsive to estrogens and antiestrogens) and in variant AE-insensitive LY-2 human breast cancer cells (ERc-positive, responsive only to estrogens). In AE-resistant LY-2 cells, the ratio of AEBS:ERc was approximately three times greater than in MCF-7 cells. Examination of 128 human breast carcinomas revealed that AEBS activity was present and could exceed ERc activity. Importantly, the partition of significant AE away from ERc was observed in human specimens. These observations identify a biochemical mechanism for antiestrogen resistance through which AE access to ERc can be totally incapacitated while sensitivity to estrogens continues. These observations indicate that AEBS activity, in addition to ERc activity, may provide helpful information for predicting the response of certain cancers to hormonal therapy.

1 Supported by NIH Grant CA52774.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at University of Kentucky Medical Center, Room MS341, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536.

Received 1/17/92. Accepted 5/27/92.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A. Ring and M. Dowsett
Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2004; 11(4): 643 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
R. Clarke, F. Leonessa, J. N. Welch, and T. C. Skaar
Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology of Antiestrogen Action and Resistance
Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2001; 53(1): 25 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Cancer Research.