Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 52, 5443s-5446s, October 1, 1992]
© 1992 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holford, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by McKay, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holford, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by McKay, L. A.

Time Trends of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Are They Real? What Do They Mean?1

Theodore R. Holford2, Tongzhang Zheng, Susan T. Mayne and Lisa A. McKay

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Factors that need to be considered in the analysis of time trends in disease incidence are age, year of diagnosis, and birth cohort. When these are included in a log-linear model, a nonidentifiability problem arises from the linear dependence among these three time factors so that only specified functions of the parameters can be unambiguously determined. One of these invariant functions is the drift or the sum of the period and cohort trend. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma incidence rates from Connecticut for the period 1935–1989 were analyzed for males and females. In addition to an age effect, both period and cohort significantly improved the fit of the model. The estimated drift shows that there has been a 10.3% increase in risk every 5 years since 1965 for females and 9.2% for males. It is unlikely that a trend of this magnitude can be attributed entirely to data artifact.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Cancer Research.