Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 52, 6188-6193, November 15, 1992]
© 1992 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mistry, P.
Right arrow Articles by Harrap, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mistry, P.
Right arrow Articles by Harrap, K. R.

Comparison of Cellular Accumulation and Cytotoxicity of Cisplatin with That of Tetraplatin and Amminedibutyratodichloro(cyclohexylamine)platinum(IV) (JM221) in Human Ovarian Carcinoma Cell Lines1

Prakash Mistry2, Lloyd R. Kelland, Swee Y. Loh, George Abel, Barry A. Murrer and Ken R. Harrap

Drug Development Section, The Institute of Cancer Research, Belmont, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG [P. M., L. R. K., S. Y. L., G. A., K. R. H.], and Johnson Matthey Technology Centre, Sonning Common, Reading [B. A. M.], United Kingdom

We have compared the cellular accumulation and cytotoxicity of three platinum compounds in a panel of five human ovarian carcinoma cell lines. The cell lines, which were established from both untreated and pretreated patients, showed a wide range in sensitivity to cisplatin and other platinum drugs. The panel consisted of two sensitive (41M, CH1), one in vivo acquired resistant (PXN/94) with moderate sensitivity, and two intrinsically resistant (SKOV-3, HX/62) cell lines. The cisplatin 2-h concentration of drug required to inhibit cell growth by 50% compared with vehicle treated control cells (IC50 values) for these cell lines were in the following order: CH1 < 41M < PXN/94 < SKOV-3 < HX/62. None of the cell lines showed saturation of platinum accumulation (per mg protein) at 2 h after exposure to cisplatin concentrations of up to 500 µM. The highest cellular platinum accumulation was observed in the sensitive 41M cell line which was established from an untreated patient. The lowest accumulation was found in the intrinsically resistant HX/62 cell line. The rate of platinum accumulation at an equimolar concentration of cisplatin was 41M > SKOV-3 > CH1 > PXN/94 > HX/62. The relationship between drug accumulation and cytotoxicity was evaluated by comparing 2-h IC50 values with platinum accumulation following exposure to both equimolar and equitoxic doses of the agent. The results suggest that reduced drug accumulation may play a partial role in the mechanism of intrinsic resistance to cisplatin in one cell line (SKOV-3) and a major role in another (HX/62), where reduced accumulation is attributable to reduced uptake rather than enhanced efflux. Decreased drug accumulation may also contribute significantly to the lower sensitivity of the PXN/94 cell line to cisplatin. Interestingly, both the PXN/94 and the sensitive CH1 cell lines, which were established from patients pretreated with platinum drugs, showed reduced drug accumulation relative to the 41M cell line. Cellular accumulation of tetraplatin and JM221 [(ammine)dibutyratodichloro(cyclohexylamine)platinum(IV)], a novel platinum(IV) dicarboxylate complex exhibiting enhanced cytotoxicity compared to cisplatin, was also examined. Comparison with platinum accumulation from cisplatin suggests that the increased cytotoxicity of tetraplatin and JM221 may be related to their increased accumulation. Significantly both agents are more lipophilic than cisplatin, which may account partially for their improved uptake in cisplatin resistant cells.

1 This study was supported by grants to the Institute of Cancer Research from the Cancer Research Campaign (UK) and the Medical Research Council, the Johnson Matthey Technology Centre, and Bristol Myers Squibb Oncology.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 2/12/92. Accepted 9/10/92.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
P. Perego, C. Caserini, L. Gatti, N. Carenini, S. Romanelli, R. Supino, D. Colangelo, I. Viano, R. Leone, S. Spinelli, et al.
A Novel Trinuclear Platinum Complex Overcomes Cisplatin Resistance in an Osteosarcoma Cell System
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 1999; 55(3): 528 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Cancer Research.