Cancer Research CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 52, 603-609, February 1, 1992]
© 1992 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graham, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Calvert, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graham, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Calvert, A. H.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of the Anthrapyrazole CI-941: Factors Compromising the Implementation of a Pharmacokinetically Guided Dose Escalation Scheme

M. A. Graham1, D. R. Newell2, B. J. Foster3, L. A. Gumbrell2, K. E. Jenns4 and A. H. Calvert2

Clinical Pharmacology Team, Drug Development Section, The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PX, England

The pharmacokinetics of the anthrapyrazole CI-941 has been investigated in conjunction with the Phase I evaluation of the drug with the intent of applying a pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation strategy. A starting dose of 5 mg/m2 was chosen, based on one-tenth the 10% lethal dose in mice. Due to the steep dose lethality relationship and nonlinear pharmacokinetics in mice, a target area under the CI-941 plasma concentration x time curve (AUC) of 110 µM x min (i.e., 40% of the mouse 10% lethal dose AUC) was chosen. This AUC was achieved in mice at 40 mg/m2. A total of 37 patients received 74 courses of CI-941 (5 to 55 mg/m2), with 26 patients consenting to pharmacokinetic monitoring. CI-941 was rapidly cleared from plasma, and a triexponential open model could be fitted to the data (t1/2{alpha} = 7.6 ± 2 min, t1/2ß = 65 ± 27 min, t1/2{zeta} = 21 ± 9 h). CI-941 was subjected to only limited urinary elimination, accounting for 5.2 ± 2.8% of the administered dose. Wide interpatient variability in plasma CI-941 clearance at the starting dose and subsequent doses precluded the implementation of a pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation scheme, and the dose was escalated in 5-mg/m2 increments until the maximally tolerated dose was achieved. A number of investigations were performed to study potential reasons for variability in CI-941 clearance. However, CI-941 plasma protein binding (95 ± 1%) and measures of pretreatment renal (51Cr-EDTA clearance), hepatic (plasma alanine transaminase and alkaline phosphatase levels), or cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fractions) did not relate strongly to CI-941 clearance. In patients treated at 40 mg/m2, the AUC values (156 to 415 µM x min) approximated or exceeded the target AUC. Fifty mg/m2 was the Phase II recommended dose. Further prospective studies are warranted to assess the utility of pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation strategies and to determine whether or not the variability encountered in clearance is unique to CI-941.

1 Present address: Cancer Research Campaign Department of Medical Oncology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland. To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at CRC Department of Medical Oncology, University of Glasgow, Beatson Laboratories, Garscube Estate, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD, Scotland.

2 Present address: University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Division of Oncology, Cancer Research Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.

3 Present address: Wayne State University School of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Detroit, MI.

4 Present address: Clinical Oncology Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, England.

Received 7/15/91. Accepted 11/13/91.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. H. Calvert and R. Plummer
The Development of Phase I Cancer Trial Methodologies: the Use of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic End Points Sets the Scene for Phase 0 Cancer Clinical Trials
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3664 - 3669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
A. S. Joshi, H. J. Pieniaszek Jr., E. E. Vokes, N. J. Vogelzang, A. F. Davidson, L. E. Richards, M. F. Chai, M. Finizio, and M. J. Ratain
Elimination Pathways of [14C]Losoxantrone in Four Cancer Patients
Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2001; 29(2): 96 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. C. Dees, L. R. Whitfield, W. R. Grove, S. Rummel, L. B. Grochow, and R. C. Donehower
A Phase I and Pharmacologic Evaluation of the DNA Intercalator CI-958 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 6(10): 3885 - 3894.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Cancer Research.