Cancer Research AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 52, 835-842, February 15, 1992]
© 1992 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kyriakos, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mattes, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kyriakos, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mattes, M. J.

The Fate of Antibodies Bound to the Surface of Tumor Cells in Vitro1

Raymond J. Kyriakos, Lisa B. Shih, Gaik Lin Ong, Kirti Patel, David M. Goldenberg and M. Jules Mattes2

Garden State Cancer Center and Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology, Newark, New Jersey 07103

The fate of monoclonal antibodies binding to the surface of human tumor cells in vitro was investigated. Seven antibodies, labeled with 125I, were tested on four cell lines, which included a melanoma and carcinomas of the ovary, kidney, and lung. The antibodies were selected only by the criterion that they not be rapidly internalized via coated pits, so that they would be representative of most antibodies reacting with cell surface antigens. After allowing binding during a 2-h incubation, unbound antibody was removed, and the release of intact or degraded antibody in the supernatant was monitored. The data demonstrate that most bound antibody was gradually degraded and released from the cell over a 2–3-day period, probably via internalization, while only a small fraction, <20% for most antibodies, appeared to dissociate intact. One exceptional antibody, MW207, dissociated largely intact. The release of intact antibody was virtually complete within 4 h, and radioactivity released after this time was predominantly in degraded form. These results demonstrate that antibody binding to the surface of viable cells must in general be considered irreversible, and hence the concept of affinity is not applicable. Since an Fab fragment of one of the antibodies dissociated rapidly, such irreversible binding appears to require bivalent attachment. Another conclusion of this study is that most antibodies binding to the cell surface are gradually internalized, which we suggest is due to the normal turnover of cell surface constituents via non-clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Several experimental approaches indicated that a large fraction of antibody retained by the cells, for at least 2 days after binding, was present at the cell surface.

1 Supported in part by USPHS Grants CA48779, CA39841, and RR05903 from the NIH.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Garden State Cancer Center and Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology, 1 Bruce Street, Newark, NJ 07103.

Received 7/23/91. Accepted 10/24/91.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
G. M. Thurber, S. C. Zajic, and K. D. Wittrup
Theoretic Criteria for Antibody Penetration into Solid Tumors and Micrometastases
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 995 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
R. B. Michel, P. M. Andrews, M. E. Castillo, and M. J. Mattes
In vitro cytotoxicity of carcinoma cells with 111In-labeled antibodies to HER-2
Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2005; 4(6): 927 - 937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Stein, S. V. Govindan, M. Hayes, G. L. Griffiths, H. J. Hansen, I. D. Horak, and D. M. Goldenberg
Advantage of a Residualizing Iodine Radiolabel in the Therapy of a Colon Cancer Xenograft Targeted with an Anticarcinoembryonic Antigen Monoclonal Antibody
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 11(7): 2727 - 2734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. B. Michel, A. V. Rosario, P. M. Andrews, D. M. Goldenberg, and M. J. Mattes
Therapy of Small Subcutaneous B-Lymphoma Xenografts with Antibodies Conjugated to Radionuclides Emitting Low-Energy Electrons
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 11(2): 777 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. V. Govindan, G. L. Griffiths, R. Stein, P. Andrews, R. M. Sharkey, H. J. Hansen, I. D. Horak, and D. M. Goldenberg
Clinical-Scale Radiolabeling of a Humanized Anticarcinoembryonic Antigen Monoclonal Antibody, hMN-14, with Residualizing 131I for Use in Radioimmunotherapy
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 153 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. B. Michel, M. E. Castillo, P. M. Andrews, and M. J. Mattes
In vitro Toxicity of A-431 Carcinoma Cells with Antibodies to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Epithelial Glycoprotein-1 Conjugated to Radionuclides Emitting Low-Energy Electrons
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2004; 10(17): 5957 - 5966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Meng, J. E. Smallshaw, L. M. Pop, M. Yen, X. Liu, L. Le, M.-A. Ghetie, E. S. Vitetta, and V. Ghetie
The Evaluation of Recombinant, Chimeric, Tetravalent Antihuman CD22 Antibodies
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 10(4): 1274 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. P. Graff and K. D. Wittrup
Theoretical Analysis of Antibody Targeting of Tumor Spheroids: Importance of Dosage for Penetration, and Affinity for Retention
Cancer Res., March 15, 2003; 63(6): 1288 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Stein, S. V. Govindan, M. J. Mattes, S. Chen, L. Reed, G. Newsome, B. J. McBride, G. L. Griffiths, H. J. Hansen, and D. M. Goldenberg
Improved Iodine Radiolabels for Monoclonal Antibody Therapy
Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 63(1): 111 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. B. Michel, R. Ochakovskaya, and M. J. Mattes
Antibody Localization to B-Cell Lymphoma Xenografts in Immunodeficient Mice: Importance of Using Residualizing Radiolabels
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 8(8): 2632 - 2639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. B. Michel and M. J. Mattes
Intracellular Accumulation of the Anti-CD20 Antibody 1F5 in B-Lymphoma Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 8(8): 2701 - 2713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Z. Yao, K. Garmestani, K. J. Wong, L. S. Park, E. Dadachova, A. Yordanov, T. A. Waldmann, W. C. Eckelman, C. H. Paik, and J. A. Carrasquillo
Comparative Cellular Catabolism and Retention of Astatine-, Bismuth-, and Lead-Radiolabeled Internalizing Monoclonal Antibody
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2001; 42(10): 1538 - 1544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. L. Ong, S. E. Elsamra, D. M. Goldenberg, and M. J. Mattes
Single-cell Cytotoxicity with Radiolabeled Antibodies
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2001; 7(1): 192 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. V. Govindan, D. M. Goldenberg, S. E. Elsamra, G. L. Griffiths, G. L. Ong, M. W. Brechbiel, J. Burton, G. Sgouros, and M. J. Mattes
Radionuclides Linked to a CD74 Antibody as Therapeutic Agents for B-Cell Lymphoma: Comparison of Auger Electron Emitters with {beta}-Particle Emitters
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2000; 41(12): 2089 - 2097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
Y. Mano, H. Suzuki, T. Terasaki, T. Iwahashi, K.-I. Ono, M. Naito, T. Tsuruo, and Y. Sugiyama
Kinetic Analysis of the Disposition of MRK16, an Anti-P-glycoprotein Monoclonal Antibody, in Tumors: Comparison Between in Vitro and in Vivo Disposition
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 1997; 283(1): 391 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Cancer Research.