| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Division of Endocrine Oncology (Department of Medical Oncology) [E. M. J. J. B., J. G. M. K., I. L. v. S., H. P., J. A. F.] and Department of Statistics [W. L. J. v. P.], Dr. Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Amplification of the c-myc and HER2/neu genes was found in 20 and 23%, respectively, of primary breast cancer tissues derived from 282 patients (median follow-up, 74 months). c-myc amplification was observed more frequently in larger tumors (P = 0.01) and in lymph node-positive patients (P = 0.01) but was not associated with age, menopausal status, or with differentiation grade or steroid receptor status. c-myc amplification was strongly negatively correlated with HER2/neu amplification (P < 0.001). In univariate analysis, amplification of c-myc proved to be a significant predictor of reduced relapse-free and overall survival (for both, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis for relapse-free survival, c-myc amplification significantly (P = 0.001) added to the prognostic power of tumor size (P < 0.001), lymph node status (P < 0.001), and estrogen receptor status (P = 0.003), with the highest relative failure rate (1.8) after lymph node status (2.2).
In this pilot study, c-myc amplification was predictive for outcome, especially among patients with node-negative disease or steroid receptor-positive tumors; 51 and 46% differences in actuarial 5-year recurrence rates when compared to patients with tumors with normal c-myc gene copy numbers, respectively. HER2/neu amplification was not associated with relapse-free survival but weakly with shorter overall survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.035). Only in the relatively small subgroup of steroid receptor-negative tumors, HER2/neu amplification may identify those patients with an increased risk of death.
In conclusion, amplification of c-myc is an independent powerful prognosticator, particularly in node-negative and steroid receptor-positive breast cancer, whereas HER2/neu amplification may be of limited prognostic value, only in steroid receptor-negative disease.
1 Supported by grants from the Dutch Cancer Foundation NKB (Grant DDHK 88-9) and Sandoz, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Endocrine Oncology, Dr. Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, P.O. Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Received 9/ 5/91. Accepted 12/13/91.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Y. Chang, J. Boulden, E. Sutanto-Ward, J. B. Duhadaway, A. P. Soler, A. J. Muller, and G. C. Prendergast Bin1 Ablation in Mammary Gland Delays Tissue Remodeling and Drives Cancer Progression Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 67(1): 100 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Al-Kuraya, P. Schraml, J. Torhorst, C. Tapia, B. Zaharieva, H. Novotny, H. Spichtin, R. Maurer, M. Mirlacher, O. Kochli, et al. Prognostic Relevance of Gene Amplifications and Coamplifications in Breast Cancer Cancer Res., December 1, 2004; 64(23): 8534 - 8540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Baker, K. Mikhitarian, W. Osta, K. Callahan, R. Hoda, F. Brescia, R. Kneuper-Hall, M. Mitas, D. J. Cole, and W. E. Gillanders Molecular Detection of Breast Cancer Cells in the Peripheral Blood of Advanced-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Using Multimarker Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction and a Novel Porous Barrier Density Gradient Centrifugation Technology Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 9(13): 4865 - 4871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jahanzeb, J. E. Mortimer, F. Yunus, D. H. Irwin, J. Speyer, A. J. Koletsky, P. Klein, T. Sabir, and L. Kronish Phase II Trial of Weekly Vinorelbine and Trastuzumab as First-Line Therapy in Patients with HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(5): 410 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Jain, K. Chin, A.-L. Borresen-Dale, B. K. Erikstein, P. E. Lonning, R. Kaaresen, and J. W. Gray Quantitative analysis of chromosomal CGH in human breast tumors associates copy number abnormalities with p53 status and patient survival PNAS, July 3, 2001; 98(14): 7952 - 7957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lin, X. Jin, C. Page, V. K. Sondak, G. Jiang, and R. K. Reynolds A Modified p53 Overcomes mdm2-mediated Oncogenic Transformation: A Potential Cancer Therapeutic Agent Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 60(20): 5895 - 5901. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pich, E. Margaria, and L. Chiusa Oncogenes and Male Breast Carcinoma: c-erbB-2 and p53 Coexpression Predicts a Poor Survival J. Clin. Oncol., August 16, 2000; 18(16): 2948 - 2956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Scorilas, E. P. Diamandis, M. A. Levesque, A. Papanastasiou-Diamandi, M. J. Khosravi, M. Giai, R. Ponzone, R. Roagna, P. Sismondi, and C. Lopez-Otin Immunoenzymatically Determined Pepsinogen C Concentration in Breast Tumor Cytosols: An Independent Favorable Prognostic Factor in Node-positive Patients Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 1999; 5(7): 1778 - 1785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Li, X. Hou, S. K. Banerjee, D.-Z. J. Liao, F. Maggouta, J. S. Norris, and S. Antonia Li Overexpression and Amplification of c-myc in the Syrian Hamster Kidney during Estrogen Carcinogenesis: A Probable Critical Role in Neoplastic Transformation Cancer Res., May 1, 1999; 59(10): 2340 - 2346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Scorilas, J. Yotis, C. Pateras, T. Trangas, and M. Talieri Predictive Value of c-erbB-2 and Cathepsin-D for Greek Breast Cancer Patients Using Univariate and Multivariate Analysis Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 1999; 5(4): 815 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. Rao, J. Houldsworth, K. Dyomina, N. Z. Parsa, J. C. Cigudosa, D. C. Louie, L. Popplewell, K. Offit, S. C. Jhanwar, and R.S.K. Chaganti Chromosomal and Gene Amplification in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Blood, July 1, 1998; 92(1): 234 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Gramlich, C. Fritsch, C. Cohen, M. Samuel, D. Hunt, P. J. Dean, and T. Gansler Oncogene Expression and Amplification in Barrett Adenocarcinoma International Journal of Surgical Pathology, April 1, 1997; 4(4): 203 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kamalati, H. E. Jolin, P. J. Mitchell, K. T. Barker, L. E. Jackson, C. J. Dean, M. J. Page, B. A. Gusterson, and M. R. Crompton Brk, a Breast Tumor-derived Non-receptor Protein-tyrosine Kinase, Sensitizes Mammary Epithelial Cells to Epidermal Growth Factor J. Biol. Chem., November 29, 1996; 271(48): 30956 - 30963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |