Cancer Research AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008  Susan G. Komen for the Cure-AACR Outstanding Investigator Award for Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

[Cancer Research 52, 1416-1421, March 15, 1992]
© 1992 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, N. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, N. E.

Hepsulfam Sensitivity in Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines: The Role of Glutathione and Glutathione S-Transferase in Resistance1

Deborah K. Armstrong, Gary B. Gordon, John Hilton, Robert T. Streeper, O. Michael Colvin and Nancy E. Davidson2

The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231

Hepsulfam (NSC 329680, 1,7-heptanediol disulfamate) is an alkylating agent that showed excellent activity against mouse and human mammary carcinoma in preclinical studies. We therefore studied the cytotoxicity of this drug in six human breast cancer cell lines (AdrRMCF7, WTMCF7, Hs578T, MDA-MB-231, T47D, and MDA-MB-468). Clonogenic assays of these cell lines showed a range of sensitivity with the 90% inhibitory concentration ranging from 3.1 µM hepsulfam (MDA-MB-468) to 32.3 µM hepsulfam (AdrRMCF7) after 24-h exposure to the drug. To evaluate possible mechanisms responsible for this observed variation in sensitivity to hepsulfam, we have studied glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity and glutathione (GSH) in these cell lines. Total cytoplasmic GST activity correlated with sensitivity; the most sensitive cell lines had the lowest GST activity, while the two most resistant cell lines, AdrRMCF7 and Hs578T, had the highest GST levels of the six cell lines. Western blot analysis showed that the only detectable isoenzyme was GST-{pi}. The amount of GST-{pi} isoform correlated with hepsulfam sensitivity in the three most resistant cell lines and was undetectable in the three most sensitive cell lines. Cellular concentrations of GSH did not correlate with hepsulfam sensitivity. However, GSH depletion with buthionine sulfoximine increased sensitivity to hepsulfam in a dose-dependent fashion in all six cell lines. Evaluation by mass spectrometry revealed that glutathione can form conjugates with hepsulfam. We conclude that the GST/GSH detoxication system plays a role in the sensitivity of these breast cancer cell lines to hepsulfam.

1 These studies were supported by NIH Grants CA 49634, CA 44530, and 5 P01 CA 15396 and by the Phil N. Allen Charitable Trust. D. K. A. was the recipient of a Stetler Research Fund Fellowship. N. E. D. was the recipient of American Cancer Society Clinical Oncology Career Development Award 90–128 and a Merck Clinician Scientist Award from The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Mass spectra were obtained in the Middle Atlantic Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, an NSF Shared Instrument Facility supported by NSF: DIR 90-16567.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, 422 N. Bond Street, Baltimore, MD 21231.

Received 8/15/91. Accepted 1/ 7/92.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
C. Syng-ai, A. L. Kumari, and A. Khar
Effect of curcumin on normal and tumor cells: Role of glutathione and bcl-2
Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2004; 3(9): 1101 - 1108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. A. Hahm, V. R. Dunn, K. A. Butash, W. L. Deveraux, P. M. Woster, R. A. Casero Jr., and N. E. Davidson
Combination of Standard Cytotoxic Agents with Polyamine Analogues in the Treatment of Breast Cancer Cell Lines
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2001; 7(2): 391 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Dai, R. S. Weinberg, S. Waxman, and Y. Jing
Malignant Cells Can Be Sensitized to Undergo Growth Inhibition and Apoptosis by Arsenic Trioxide Through Modulation of the Glutathione Redox System
Blood, January 1, 1999; 93(1): 268 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. S. Morrow, P. K. Smitherman, S. K. Diah, E. Schneider, and A. J. Townsend
Coordinated Action of Glutathione S-Transferases (GSTs) and Multidrug Resistance Protein 1 (MRP1) in Antineoplastic Drug Detoxification. MECHANISM OF GST A1-1- AND MRP1-ASSOCIATED RESISTANCE TO CHLORAMBUCIL IN MCF7 BREAST CARCINOMA CELLS
J. Biol. Chem., August 7, 1998; 273(32): 20114 - 20120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Cancer Research.