Cancer Research Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine  Susan G. Komen for the Cure-AACR Outstanding Investigator Award for Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

[Cancer Research 52, 1515-1519, March 15, 1992]
© 1992 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Djuric, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Valeriote, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Djuric, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Valeriote, F. A.

DNA Damage and Cytotoxicity in L1210 Cells by Ellipticine and a Structural Analogue, N-2-(Diethylaminoethyl)-9-hydroxyellipticinium Chloride1

Zora Djuric2, Carleen K. Everett and Frederick A. Valeriote

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201

N-2-(Diethylaminoethyl)-9-hydroxyellipticinium chloride (DHE) is a structural analogue of ellipticine that is currently a leading compound for clinical trials. We have investigated the mechanism of DNA damage by this compound in murine L1210 leukemia cells using the method of alkaline elution. Although DHE was about 100-fold more cytotoxic than ellipticine, this increased cytotoxicity was not accompanied by greater amounts of DNA strand breakage or protein-DNA cross-linking. The single strand breaks caused by both compounds were protein associated and could be accounted for by the presence of double strand breaks. DNA damage by the compounds therefore was consistent with topoisomerase II inhibition. Unlike DHE, 80% of the DNA damage elicited by ellipticine was repaired within 1 h after removal of drug. For DHE, 20-h incubations in drug-free media were required to obtain 70% repair of single strand DNA breaks. These data indicated that although both ellipticine and DHE may inhibit topoisomerase II, the type of DNA damage which resulted in topoisomerase II inhibition by DHE was much more persistent than the DNA damage elicited by ellipticine.

1 Supported in part by the Wayne State University Ben Kasle Trust Fund for Cancer Research and Grants CA53001 and 1PO1 CA46560 from the NIH. A portion of this work was presented at the meeting of the American Association of Cancer Research, March 15–18, 1991, Houston, TX.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Received 9/ 3/91. Accepted 1/ 9/92.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Cancer Research.