| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Division of pediatrics [E. M. N.], Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research [S. A. A., J. S. H., L. A. L., K. A. M., R. W. M., J. W. R., G. S., J. H. D.], and Department of Biostatistics [C. A.], City of Hope Cancer Research Center, Duarte, California 91010
Twenty-seven patients with advanced cancer were entered in a phase I study of bolus i.v. 5-fluorouracil at a dose of 370 mg/m2/day for 5 days combined with a continuous i.v. infusion of (6S)-folinic acid for 5.5 days, starting 24 h in advance of the first 5-fluorouracil dose. The dose of (6S)-folinic acid was escalated in cohorts of patients from 250 mg/m2/day to a maximum of 1000 mg/m2/day. The pharmacokinetics of (6S)-folinic acid were studied in the 3 patients given 250 mg/m2/day and in 6 patients given 1000 mg/m2/day. The mean steady-state plasma concentrations of (6S)-folinic acid and its principal metabolite (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolate at the 250 mg/m2/day dose were 2.7 and 5.1 µM, respectively. Both concentrations were comparable to the concentrations produced when (6S)-folinic acid was administered as half of a (6R,S)-folinic acid mixture (E. M. Newman et al., Cancer Res., 49: 57555760, 1989). At the 1000 mg/m2/day dose of (6S)-folinic acid, the concentration of (6S)-folinic acid was 15.3 µM, more than the 4-fold increase predicted by linear pharmacokinetics, while the concentration of (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolate was only 16.5 µM. The change in the ratio of the parent compound to its metabolite was accounted for by a decrease in the nonrenal clearance of (6S)-folinic acid, probably indicating saturation of its metabolism. The toxicities observed in this phase I trial, including stomatitis, diarrhea, neutropenia, and anemia, did not differ in nature or severity from those produced by 5-fluorouracil and (6R,S)-folinic acid when administered on the same schedule. Finally, the degree of toxicity did not appear to depend on the dose of (6S)-folinic acid over the range of doses tested.
1 Supported by NIH Grants CA38053 and CA33572 and by the American Cyanamid Co., Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, NY. A preliminary report of these results has been presented (J. H. Doroshow et al., Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., 10: 97, 1991).
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Pediatrics, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010.
Received 9/23/91. Accepted 2/25/92.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Jolivet, A. Dayan, M. Beauchemin, D. Chahla, A. Mamo, and R. Bertrand Biochemical and Molecular Studies of Human Methenyltetrahydrofolate Synthetase Oncologist, August 1, 1996; 1(4): 248 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Jolivet, A Dayan, M Beauchemin, D Chahla, A Mamo, and R Bertrand Biochemical and molecular studies of human methenyltetrahydrofolate synthetase Stem Cells, January 1, 1996; 14(1): 33 - 40. [Abstract] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |