Cancer Research Donn Young  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 53, 4534-4541, October 1, 1993]
© 1993 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hard, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hard, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, G. M.

Major Difference in the Hepatocarcinogenicity and DNA Adduct Forming Ability between Toremifene and Tamoxifen in Female Crl:CD(BR) Rats1

Gordon C. Hard2, Michael J. Iatropoulos, Kevin Jordan, Leila Radi, Olgierd P. Kaltenberg, Anthony R. Imondi and Gary M. Williams

American Health Foundation, Valhalla, New York 10595 [G. C. H., M. J. I., K. J., L. R., O P. K., G. M. W.], and Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio 43216 [A. R. I.]

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at American Health Foundation, 1 Dana Road, Valhalla, NY 10595.

The hepatoproliferative effects of 2 antiestrogens, tamoxifen and toremifene, were compared in a sequential 15-month study in which 2 doses of each compound were administered by daily gavage to female Sprague-Dawley rats for up to 12 months. The doses were 11.3 and 22.6 mg/kg for tamoxifen and 12 and 24 mg/kg for toremifene. There were scheduled sacrifices at 3, 6, 12, and 15 months, the latter including a 3-month recovery period from the 12th through the 14th month. In the chronic toxicity study, tamoxifen at 22.6 mg/kg produced 100% incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma at the 12- and 15-month sacrifice intervals and 67% and 71% incidences at the 11.3-mg/kg dose. Sequential observations showed an increased incidence of glutathione S-transferase-positive foci of hepatocellular alteration by 3 months with tamoxifen in the absence of hepatotoxicity, with the first liver carcinoma appearing by 6 months of treatment. Unscheduled deaths occurring beyond 7.5 months in the tamoxifen treated groups were due in almost all cases to liver cancer. In striking contrast, toremifene did not produce any hepatoproliferative effects at 12- and 24-mg/kg dose levels, nor in a pilot study at 48 mg/kg. The 24-mg/kg dose of toremifene exerted an inhibiting effect on foci of hepatocellular alteration in rat liver detectable by glutathione S-transferase immunohistochemistry at 3 months and by conventional histology at 12 months. An antiproliferative effect was also evident in mammary gland and anterior pituitary where both toremifene and tamoxifen suppressed tumor incidence in comparison to the control group. The ability of these drugs to modify rat liver DNA after p.o. administration was investigated using the 32P-postlabeling assay. Administration of tamoxifen at 45 mg/kg for 7 days produced liver DNA nucleoside modifications represented by 7 spots on the autoradiogram. Unlike tamoxifen, toremifene did not produce any modified bases in rat liver DNA detectable by the 32P-postlabeling technique. The dose levels of tamoxifen that are strongly hepatocarcinogenic in the rat are compared with doses used in humans in various applications. Taking internal drug exposure into account, we conclude that the margin of safety for use of tamoxifen as an endocrine prophylactic agent for healthy, but breast cancer prone, women is questionable.

1 This research was supported financially by Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH, and Farmos Group, Ltd., Turku, Finland.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 4/ 8/93. Accepted 7/26/93.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
K. Brown
Is tamoxifen a genotoxic carcinogen in women?
Mutagenesis, September 1, 2009; 24(5): 391 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. Y. Kim, N. Suzuki, Y. R. S. Laxmi, and S. Shibutani
INEFFICIENT REPAIR OF TAMOXIFEN-DNA ADDUCTS IN RATS AND MICE
Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 311 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. Y. Kim, Y. R. S. Laxmi, N. Suzuki, K. Ogura, T. Watabe, M. W. Duffel, and S. Shibutani
FORMATION OF TAMOXIFEN-DNA ADDUCTS VIA O-SULFONATION, NOT O-ACETYLATION, OF {alpha}-HYDROXYTAMOXIFEN IN RAT AND HUMAN LIVERS
Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1673 - 1678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Shibutani, N. Suzuki, Y. R. S. Laxmi, L. J. Schild, R. L. Divi, A. P. Grollman, and M. C. Poirier
Identification of Tamoxifen-DNA Adducts in Monkeys Treated with Tamoxifen
Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 63(15): 4402 - 4406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. J. Boocock, K. Brown, A. H. Gibbs, E. Sanchez, K. W. Turteltaub, and I. N.H. White
Identification of human CYP forms involved in the activation of tamoxifen and irreversible binding to DNA
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2002; 23(11): 1897 - 1902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
T. Kasahara, M. Hashiba, T. Harada, and M. Degawa
Change in the gene expression of hepatic tamoxifen-metabolizing enzymes during the process of tamoxifen-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in female rats
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2002; 23(3): 491 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Raghow, M. Z. Hooshdaran, S. Katiyar, and M. S. Steiner
Toremifene Prevents Prostate Cancer in the Transgenic Adenocarcinoma of Mouse Prostate Model
Cancer Res., March 1, 2002; 62(5): 1370 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. Gamboa da Costa, L.P. McDaniel-Hamilton, R. H. Heflich, M.M. Marques, and F. A. Beland
DNA adduct formation and mutant induction in Sprague-Dawley rats treated with tamoxifen and its derivatives
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2001; 22(8): 1307 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
P. W. Fan and J. L. Bolton
Bioactivation of Tamoxifen to Metabolite E Quinone Methide: Reaction with Glutathione and DNA
Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2001; 29(6): 891 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. H. Phillips
Understanding the genotoxicity of tamoxifen?
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2001; 22(6): 839 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Shibutani, A. Ravindernath, I. Terashima, N. Suzuki, Y. R. Santosh Laxmi, Y. Kanno, M. Suzuki, T. I. Apak, J. J. Sheng, and M. W. Duffel
Mechanism of Lower Genotoxicity of Toremifene Compared with Tamoxifen
Cancer Res., May 1, 2001; 61(10): 3925 - 3931.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
I. N.H. White, P. Carthew, R. Davies, J. Styles, K. Brown, J. E. Brown, L. L. Smith, and E. A. Martin
Short-term dosing of {{alpha}}-hydroxytamoxifen results in DNA damage but does not lead to liver tumours in female Wistar/Han rats
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2001; 22(4): 553 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. S. Lee, J. M. Schafer, K. Yao, G. England, R. M. O’Regan, A. D. L. Reyes, and V. C. Jordan
Cross-Resistance of Triphenylethylene-type Antiestrogens but not ICI 182,780 in Tamoxifen-stimulated Breast Tumors Grown in Athymic Mice
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2000; 6(12): 4893 - 4899.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. K. Osborne and S. A. W. Fuqua
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators: Structure, Function, and Clinical Use
J. Clin. Oncol., September 17, 2000; 18(17): 3172 - 3186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. Umemoto, Y. Monden, M. Suwa, Y. Kanno, M. Suzuki, C.-X. Lin, Y. Ueyama, Md.A. Momen, A. Ravindernath, S. Shibutani, et al.
Identification of hepatic tamoxifen-DNA adducts in mice: {alpha}-(N2-deoxyguanosinyl)tamoxifen and {alpha}-(N2-deoxyguanosinyl)tamoxifen N-oxide
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2000; 21(9): 1737 - 1744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
W. Davis, A. Hewer, K. M. Rajkowski, W. Meinl, H. Glatt, and D. H. Phillips
Sex Differences in the Activation of Tamoxifen to DNA Binding Species in Rat Liver in Vivo and in Rat Hepatocytes in Vitro: Role of Sulfotransferase Induction
Cancer Res., June 1, 2000; 60(11): 2887 - 2891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
L. Klotz, H. J. Hacker, D. Klingmuller, P. Bannasch, U. Pfeifer, and F. Dombrowski
Hepatocellular Alterations after Intraportal Transplantation of Ovarian Tissue in Ovariectomized Rats
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2000; 156(5): 1613 - 1626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Komi and O. Lassila
Nonsteroidal anti-estrogens inhibit the functional differentiation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells
Blood, May 1, 2000; 95(9): 2875 - 2882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
P. Carthew, R. E. Edwards, B. M. Nolan, E. A. Martin, R. T. Heydon, I. N.H. White, and M. J. Tucker
Tamoxifen induces endometrial and vaginal cancer in rats in the absence of endometrial hyperplasia
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2000; 21(4): 793 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
H. Bartsch, D. H. Phillips, J. Nair, A. Hewer, G. Meyberg-Solomeyer, and E.-M. Grischke
Lack of evidence for tamoxifen- and toremifene-DNA adducts in lymphocytes of treated patients
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2000; 21(4): 845 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
I. N.H. White
The tamoxifen dilemma
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 1999; 20(7): 1153 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
F. Cosman and R. Lindsay
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators: Clinical Spectrum
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 1999; 20(3): 418 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. Terashima, N. Suzuki, and S. Shibutani
Mutagenic Potential of {{alpha}}-(N2-Deoxyguanosinyl)tamoxifen Lesions, the Major DNA Adducts Detected in Endometrial Tissues of Patients Treated with Tamoxifen
Cancer Res., May 1, 1999; 59(9): 2091 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. M. Williams
Re: Effects of the Antiestrogens Tamoxifen, Toremifene, and ICI 182,780 on Endometrial Cancer Growth
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 21, 1999; 91(8): 722 - 722.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
F. A. Beland, L. P. McDaniel, and M. M. Marques
Comparison of the DNA adducts formed by tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen in vivo
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 1999; 20(3): 471 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. R. Osborne, A. Hewer, W. Davis, A. J. Strain, A. Keogh, I. R. Hardcastle, and D. H. Phillips
Idoxifene derivatives are less reactive to DNA than tamoxifen derivatives, both chemically and in human and rat liver cells
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 1999; 20(2): 293 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. K. Osborne
Tamoxifen in the Treatment of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., November 26, 1998; 339(22): 1609 - 1618.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
S. Karlsson, M. J. Iatropoulos, G. M. Williams, L. Kangas, and L. Nieminen
The Proliferation in Uterine Compartments of Intact Rats of Two Different Strains Exposed to High Doses of Tamoxifen or Toremifene
Toxicol Pathol, November 1, 1998; 26(6): 759 - 768.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. L. Weaver, J. F. Contrera, B. A. Rosenzweig, K. L. Thompson, P. J. Faustino, J. M. Strong, C. D. Ellison, L. W. Anderson, H. R. Prasanna, P. E. Long-Bradley, et al.
An Evaluation of the Hemizygous Transgenic Tg.AC Mouse for Carcinogenicity Testing of Pharmaceuticals. I. Evidence for a Confounding Nonresponder Phenotype
Toxicol Pathol, July 1, 1998; 26(4): 532 - 540.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
J. I. Macgregor and V. C. Jordan
Basic Guide to the Mechanisms of Antiestrogen Action
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 1998; 50(2): 151 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. Yao and V. C. Jordan
Questions about Tamoxifen and the Future Use of Antiestrogens
Oncologist, April 1, 1998; 3(2): 104 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
G. M. Williams
Safety Assessment of Pharmaceuticals: Examples of Inadequate Assessments and a Mechanistic Approach to Assuring Adequate Assessment
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 1997; 25(1): 32 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. C Eagle
Manufacturer's reply
BMJ, October 12, 1996; 313(7062): 945 - 945.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
V C Jordan
Safety of tamoxifen
BMJ, May 28, 1994; 308(6941): 1438 - 1438.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
G M Williams
Safety of tamoxifen
BMJ, February 19, 1994; 308(6927): 534 - 534.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association for Cancer Research.