Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 53, 4837-4842, October 15, 1993]
© 1993 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erlichman, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bunting, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erlichman, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bunting, P.

Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of Cyclosporin A Combined with Doxorubicin1

Charles Erlichman2, Malcolm Moore, Jake J. Thiessen, Ian G. Kerr, Scott Walker, Phyllis Goodman, Georg Bjarnason, Carlo DeAngelis and Peter Bunting

Departments of Medicine [C. E., M. M.] and Biostatistics [P. G.], Princess margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M4X 1K9; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 2S2 [J. J. T.]; Toronto Bayview Regional Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada M4N 3M5 [I. G. K., G. B.]; and Department of Pharmacy [S. W., C. D.] and Biochemistry [P. B.], Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada M4N 3M5

We performed a phase I trial of cyclosporin A (CsA) in combination with doxorubicin (dox) to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination in man, to define the quantitative and qualitative toxicities of the combination, and to determine the pharmacokinetics of the two drugs when used together. CsA was administered as a continuous infusion for 6 days, and dox was administered as a single 10-min infusion 24 h after the initiation of CsA. The starting CsA infusion rate was 5 µg/kg/min, and the dox starting dose was 30 mg/m2. Courses were administered every 4 weeks with first CsA and then dox being escalated in consecutive cohorts of patients until the MTD was determined. Twenty-three patients and 40 courses were evaluable for toxicity. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 23 patients on the first course for whole blood CsA and plasma dox and doxorubicinol. The MTD of CsA was 6 µg/kg/min, and for dox it was 45 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance did not change over the infusion period. Bilirubin increased from a median of 10 µmol/liter at the initiation of the infusion to a median of 40.4 µmol/liter at the end of the infusion but returned to normal before the next cycle of therapy. Nausea and vomiting were common and marked, whereas thrombocytopenia was mild. Two patients, one with small cell lung cancer and one with breast cancer, had stable disease while receiving treatment for 5 and 6 months, respectively. Mean whole blood steady state concentrations of CsA were 2210 ng/ml during the infusion with total body clearance of 0.177 liter/h/kg. The area under the concentration x time curve (AUC) increased linearly with dose of dox, and total body clearance was independent of dose. The mean total body clearance was 2.46 liters/h/m2, and terminal half-life was 49.6 h. The AUC for dox was greater and clearance was less than has been previously reported at the doses administered in this study. The ratio of AUC for doxorubicinol to AUC for dox was less than expected, suggesting that the metabolism and/or excretion of dox was decreased when administered with CsA. We conclude that dox can be combined with infusioned CsA but at a lower dose than when given alone. This may be due to altered metabolism and/or excretion of dox or increased bone marrow stem cell sensitivity to dox.

1 This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grant CA-52182-02.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Princess Margaret Hospital, 500 Sherbourne Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4X 1K9.

Received 3/17/93. Accepted 8/10/93.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. M. Fracasso, L. J. Goldstein, D. P. de Alwis, J. S. Rader, M. A. Arquette, S. A. Goodner, L. P. Wright, C. L. Fears, R. J. Gazak, V. A. M. Andre, et al.
Phase I Study of Docetaxel in Combination with the P-Glycoprotein Inhibitor, Zosuquidar, in Resistant Malignancies
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 10(21): 7220 - 7228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Patnaik, E. Warner, M. Michael, M. J. Egorin, M. J. Moore, L. L. Siu, P. M. Fracasso, S. Rivkin, I. Kerr, M. Litchman, et al.
Phase I Dose-Finding and Pharmacokinetic Study of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin With Oral Valspodar in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2000; 18(21): 3677 - 3689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association for Cancer Research.