Cancer Research AACR Membership  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 53, 4843-4849, October 15, 1993]
© 1993 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Supko, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kraut, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Supko, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kraut, E. H.

Phase I Evaluation and Pharmacokinetic Study of Pyrazine-2-diazohydroxide Administered as a Single Bolus Intravenous Injection in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors1

Jeffrey G. Supko2, S. P. Balcerzak and Eric H. Kraut

Developmental Therapeutics Progrma, Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [J. G. S.], and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 [S. P. B., E. H. K.]

The sodium salt of pyrazine-2-diazohydroxide (PZDH; NSC 361456) was identified as an active congener of the antitumor lead pyridine-2-diazotate with enhanced chemical stability under physiological conditions. In a phase I trial of PZDH administered as a single i.v. bolus injection, 19 patients with refractory solid tumors received 44 courses of therapy at dose levels ranging from 50 to 350 mg/m2. No objective responses to PZDH were noted. Myelosuppression characterized by prolonged, delayed onset leukopenia and thrombocytopenia was the dose limiting toxicity. A maximum tolerated dose of 350 mg/m2 was identified for this treatment schedule. Nonhematological toxicity was limited to severe nausea and vomiting, experienced by all patients treated at the lower doses, although reasonably well controlled when antiemetics were given prior to chemotherapy. The plasma pharmacokinetics of PZDH was evaluated following a single course of therapy in 16 patients. Drug levels were monitored using a specific capillary gas chromatographic assay with a 1-ng/ml lower limit of quantitation. In patients treated with doses greater than 50 mg/m2, the concentration of PZDH in plasma declined in a distinctly triexponential manner and remained above 1.5 ng/ml for at least 8 h. However, the initial decay phase, characterized by a harmonic mean half-life of 3.9 ± 3.5 (SD) min (range, 2.2–6.3 min), was the primary determinant of drug disposition, as indicated by its 85.5–93.1% contribution to the area under the plasma concentration-time profiles from time zero to infinity. The harmonic mean terminal half-life increased with escalations in dose from 2.7 ± 0.8 h (n = 2) at 100 mg/m2 to 8.5 ± 3.0 h at 350 mg/m2 (n = 6). Total plasma drug clearance was very similar in patients treated with doses of 50–250 mg/m2, exhibiting a mean value of 42.5 ± 7.8 liters/h/m2 (n = 10); however, it was significantly lower at the 350 mg/m2 dose level, 27.2 ± 6.6 liters/h/m2 (n = 6; P < 0.002), denoting a departure from linear pharmacokinetic behavior. The rather low steady state apparent volume of distribution, which ranged from 6.0 ± 1.5 (50 mg/m2, n = 2) to 12.7 ± 8.0 (350 mg/m2, n = 6) liters/m2, was indicative of limited distribution of the drug into body tissue. The absence of objective antitumor effects should not discourage continued evaluation of PZDH against solid tumors selected for probable sensitivity as indicated by preclinical testing. A dose of 250 mg/m2 on a single i.v. bolus schedule is recommended for these phase II trials.

1 This work was conducted at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center under the support of Grants N01-CM-73701, CA-09338, and CA-16058 from the National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services. Preliminary results were presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, May, 1991, Houston, TX.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at the Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National Cancer Institute, Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Fairview Center Suite 201, 1003 West 7th Street, Frederick, MD, 21701-8527.

Received 4/26/93. Accepted 8/ 6/93.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association for Cancer Research.