Cancer Research Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention  09 AM Call for Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 53, 1239-1243, March 15, 1993]
© 1993 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krishnaswamy, G.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krishnaswamy, G.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, W. C.

Cell Killing and Chromosomal Aberrations Induced in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells by Treating with Cisplatin at 41.5°C during G1 or Late S Phase1

Girija Krishnaswamy and William C. Dewey2

Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143

Variation in sensitivity to cisplatin during the cell cycle was studied in synchronous Chinese hamster ovary cells treated during G1 or late S for 1 h at 41.5°C with cisplatin (0.25–1.25 µg/ml, 0.8–4.2 x 10-6 M). The cells were assayed for cell killing and chromosomal aberrations. Either they were plated for colony survival, or colcemid was added from 12 to 40 h after plating followed by fixation 4 h later for analysis of chromosomal aberrations after the cells completed 1 or 2 cycles (i.e., first or second mitosis). When the cells were treated either in G1 or late S, the cells entering metaphase exhibited primarily chromatid-type deletions and exchanges. However, aberrations were observed primarily in the first mitosis when cells were treated in G1 compared with aberrations being observed in both the first and second mitoses when cells were treated in late S. For a given amount of cytotoxicity or cytological damage, the cisplatin concentration at 41.5°C could be reduced 4–6-fold compared with treatment at 37°C. For low cisplatin concentrations of less than 0.5–0.7 µg/ml (survival, ~0.3), heat killing predominated, and cells treated in S phase were more sensitive than those treated in G1. However, for cisplatin concentrations greater than 0.5–0.7 µg/ml, cisplatin cytotoxicity predominated, and for both cell killing and chromosomal aberrations, the cells treated in G1 were ~1.5 times more sensitive than those treated in late S. Furthermore, the positive correlation between survival and aberration frequency was similar for cells treated at 37°C or 41.5°C in either G1 or late S. These results suggest that cisplatin administered at 37°C or 41.5°C causes cell lethality primarily by the induction of chromosomal aberrations.

1 Supported by NCI Grants CA31813 and CA02915.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, MCB 200, P.O. Box 0806, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.

Received 9/ 3/92. Accepted 1/11/93.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association for Cancer Research.