Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 53, 1286-1292, March 15, 1993]
© 1993 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schiller, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Sondel, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schiller, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Sondel, P. M.

A Direct Comparison of Immunological and Clinical Effects of Interleukin 2 with and without Interferon-{alpha} in Humans1

Joan H. Schiller2, Jacquelyn Hank, Barry Storer, Agnes A. Borchert, Karen Huseby Moore, Mark Albertini, Robin Bechhofer, Osvaldo Wesley, Raymond R. Brown, Ann Mrowca Bastin and Paul M. Sondel

University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin 53792

Interleukin 2 (IL-2) and interferon-{alpha} (IFN-{alpha}) are cytokines with synergistic antitumor effects in mouse models. The biological effects of this combination, however, have not been directly compared to each agent alone in humans. We conducted a Phase 1B trial of IL-2 plus or minus IFN-{alpha} in 38 cancer patients. The objectives of this trial were to determine which doses of IFN-{alpha} and IL-2 maximally enhanced biological responses, and to determine whether the combined administration of IFN-{alpha} and IL-2 would result in a potentiation of biological responses over IL-2 alone. Patients received 4 days of IL-2 (1.5 x 106 units/m2/day or 3.0 x 106 units/m2/day) as a continuous infusion followed by a 3-day rest period, weekly for 3 weeks, with a 3-week rest period between 2 treatment courses. IFN-{alpha} (0.5 x 106 or 5 x 106 units/m2/day) was administered S.C. on days 1–4 weekly for 3 weeks with one of the 3-week courses. Patients were randomized to receive either IL-2 alone for course 1, followed by IL-2/IFN-{alpha} for course 2, or IL-2/IFN-{alpha} in course 1, followed by IL-2 alone. Immunological parameters were evaluated before treatment, and 24 h after completion of the third week of IL-2.

A statistically significant increase in the percentage of circulating natural killer cells (CD56), natural killer cells bearing the Fc receptor (CD16), and activated T cells (CD25) was observed following IL-2 alone, and following IL-2 plus IFN-{alpha}. Significant increases in lymphocyte-activated killer cell cytotoxicity, antibody cellular cytotoxicity, and serum IL-2 receptor were also observed following both IL-2 and IL-2 plus IFN-{alpha}. However, no significant differences were observed in the magnitude of the increase in the IL-2-alone group when compared to the IL-2 plus IFN-{alpha} group. The mean fluorescent intensity of monocytes positive for HLA-DR and Fc receptor expression also increased significantly in both groups, as did serum ß2-microglobulin expression and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity. However, increases were not significantly different between patients receiving IL-2 alone and IL-2 plus IFN-{alpha}. No dose response effect for IFN-{alpha} was observed for any of the parameters assessed.

Toxicities consisted primarily of constitutional toxicities, including fever, rigors, malaise, headache, anorexia, and a decrease in performance status. No clinically significant differences in toxicities were observed between courses consisting of IL-2 and those consisting of IFN-{alpha} and IL-2. Two patients had a partial response, and 5 patients had a minor response (partial plus minor response rate, 18%).

In conclusion, we did not observe a difference in biological activity between IL-2 and IL-2 plus IFN-{alpha} in any of the immunological parameters we studied. Although this regimen was relatively well-tolerated, we cannot conclude that IFN-{alpha} adds significantly to the immunological or therapeutic activity of IL-2 alone.

1 J. H. S. is supported in part by the Veterans Administration. This work was supported in part by NIH Grants CM-87290, CA-53441, and CA-22685, and the General Clinical Research Center's Program, NIH Grant MO1 RRO3186.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Room K4/6, CSC, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792.

Received 8/14/92. Accepted 1/ 5/93.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. A. Hank, J. Surfus, J. Gan, M. Albertini, M. Lindstrom, J. H. Schiller, K. M. Hotton, M. Khorsand, and P. M. Sondel
Distinct Clinical and Laboratory Activity of Two Recombinant Interleukin-2 Preparations
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 1999; 5(2): 281 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association for Cancer Research.