Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact  Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 54, 1918s-1923s, April 1, 1994]
© 1994 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simic, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simic, M. G.

DNA Markers of Oxidative Processes in Vivo: Relevance to Carcinogenesis and Anticarcinogenesis1

Michael G. Simic2

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6072

Understanding endogenous mechanisms of carcinogenesis through measuring oxidative markers has advanced greatly in the past decade, paralleling similar achievements in exogenous carcinogenesis through measurements of DNA-adduct markers. Understanding the mechanisms of genesis, metabolism, and physiological properties of the products of oxidative stress is essential in determining products that are specific molecular markers. Measurement technology allows sensitive detection, monitoring, and quantitation of oxidative DNA markers both locally in tissue and systematically in body fluids. Both approaches can be used to assess oxidative stress. Although measurement of markers of oxidative stress relevant to carcinogenesis is at an early stage of development, this approach will probably become an integral part of early diagnostics and the assessment of tumor metabolism. For comprehensive understanding of endogenous carcinogenesis, oxidative markers of protein and lipid damage are also necessary. A larger and perhaps more important application of oxidative markers is in anticarcinogenesis, particularly chemoprevention. Because urinary markers are a noninvasive methodology, they are especially appropriate for assessing and indexing the anticarcinogenic potential of diets and foods from modulation of the rate of DNA damage, which may be correlated with mutagenic and, ultimately, carcinogenic potential.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1994 by the American Association for Cancer Research.