| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
and ß Expression to Cytotoxicity of Antineoplastic Agents in Human Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cell Lines1
Department of Pharmacology [G. A. B., J. P. M., L. G., R. T., K. L. D., G. J. G.], Medicine [D. W. H., G. J. G.], and Pediatrics [M. H. F.] and the Interdepartmental Division of Oncology [D. W. H., G. J. G.], University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1L4; Department of Medicine and Pathology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Ontario, M4X 1K9 [D. W. H.]; and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8 [M. H. F.], Canada
The levels of expression of topoisomerase II
and topoisomerase IIß were investigated in six established cell lines of human childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) as a function of doubling time, cell cycle distribution, and of sensitivity to the antineoplastic agents Adriamycin and etoposide. The slowest growing cell line, ALL-G, was most sensitive to both drugs, whereas the fastest growing cell line, ALL-C, was 15.3- and 6.4-fold more resistant than ALL-G to Adriamycin and etoposide, respectively. Furthermore, ALL-W, the second most rapidly dividing cell line, was most resistant to both Adriamycin (22.8-fold) and etoposide (14.1-fold). Expression of topoisomerase II
varied inversely with doubling time, whereas no correlation was found between topoisomerase IIß levels and doubling time. Expression of topoisomerase IIß varied inversely with that of topoisomerase II
. The level of topoisomerase II
correlated directly with the percentage of cells in S and G2-M phases, whereas topoisomerase IIß expression varied directly with the number of cells in G1. An inverse correlation was found between the level of expression of topoisomerase IIß and resistance to Adriamycin, whereas a direct correlation was observed between the level of expression of topoisomerase II
and resistance to Adriamycin. Studies with etoposide, although not statistically significant, were consistent with the pattern observed with Adriamycin. These findings suggest that in ALL cells, cytocidal activity of Adriamycin and etoposide may be mediated, at least in part, by topoisomerase IIß.
1 This research was supported by an operating grant from the Leukemia Research Fund of Canada and by Grants 4008 and 4518 from the National Cancer Institute of Canada.
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at the Interdepartmental Division of Oncology, University of Toronto, 92 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L4, Canada.
Received 7/ 6/94. Accepted 10/31/94.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Reis, N. Giocanti, C. Hennequin, F. Megnin-Chanet, M. Fernet, R. Filomenko, A. Bettaieb, E. Solary, and V. Favaudon A role for PKC{zeta} in potentiation of the topoisomerase II activity and etoposide cytotoxicity by wortmannin Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2005; 4(10): 1457 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Plo, H. Hernandez, G. Kohlhagen, D. Lautier, Y. Pommier, and G. Laurent Overexpression of the Atypical Protein Kinase C zeta Reduces Topoisomerase II Catalytic Activity, Cleavable Complexes Formation, and Drug-induced Cytotoxicity in Monocytic U937 Leukemia Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 23, 2002; 277(35): 31407 - 31415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. U. Kurz, S. E. Wilson, K. B. Leader, B. P. Sampey, W. P. Allan, J. C. Yalowich, and D. J. Kroll The Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Sodium Butyrate Induces DNA Topoisomerase II{alpha} Expression and Confers Hypersensitivity to Etoposide in Human Leukemic Cell Lines Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2001; 1(2): 121 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A J Lodge, A G Hall, M M Reid, G G McIntosh, M Steward, J J Anderson, C H W Horne, and B Angus Topoisomerase II{{alpha}} and II{beta} expression in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: relation to prognostic factors and clinical outcome J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2001; 54(1): 31 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Gao, K.-C. Huang, E. F. Yamasaki, K. K. Chan, L. Chohan, and R. M. Snapka XK469, a selective topoisomerase IIbeta poison PNAS, October 12, 1999; 96(21): 12168 - 12173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Willmore, A. J. Frank, K. Padget, M. J. Tilby, and C. A. Austin Etoposide Targets Topoisomerase IIalpha and IIbeta in Leukemic Cells: Isoform-Specific Cleavable Complexes Visualized and Quantified In Situ by a Novel Immunofluorescence Technique Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 1998; 54(1): 78 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Froelich-Ammon and N. Osheroff Topoisomerase Poisons: Harnessing the Dark Side of Enzyme Mechanism J. Biol. Chem., September 15, 1995; 270(37): 21429 - 21432. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Boland, K. A. Fitzgerald, and L. A. J. O'Neill Topoisomerase II Is Required for Mitoxantrone to Signal Nuclear Factor kappa B Activation in HL60 Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 2000; 275(33): 25231 - 25238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |