| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park, Research Division, Smithville, Texas 78957 [C. M. A., T. C.], and Departments of Pathology [A. S.] and Epidemiology [M. B., J. C.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030
To better understand the timing for presentation of allelic losses in human breast carcinogenesis, we compared the allelotypic profile of 23 in situ ductal carcinomas with that of 29 invasive ductal carcinomas. We also compared the allelotype of the invasive ductal breast carcinomas with that of 23 invasive lobular breast carcinomas. These studies were performed by means of microsatellite length polymorphisms from microdissected paraffin sections. We observed that involvement of chromosome arms 1p, 3p, 3q, 6p, 16p, 18p, 18q, 22q, and possibly 6q and 11p appear to be late events in breast cancer progression because allelic losses or imbalances affecting these areas were observed with very low frequency at the in situ stage. On the other hand, allelic imbalances and losses affecting chromosome arms 7p, 16q, 17p, and 17q appear to be early abnormalities because they were observed in approximately 2530% of ductal carcinoma in situ lesions. Allelic losses and imbalances affecting the 8p arm were frequently observed in invasive lobular breast carcinomas. It was also interesting that microsatellite instability, also known as replication error (RER) phenotype, was found to occur at a high frequency in invasive lobular breast carcinomas because 9 of 23 (39%) were RER+, compared with 7 of 52 (13.5%) RER+ of breast cancers with ductal differentiation (P = 0.012, x2 test). Our findings provide for the first time molecular evidence suggesting that invasive lobular breast carcinomas may arise by a different mechanism of carcinogenesis than ductal carcinomas.
1 This work was supported by United States Army Breast Cancer Program Grant DAMD 17-94-J-4078 (C. M. A.) and in part by NIH Grant R01 CA59967 (C. M. A.) and a University Cancer Foundation matching supplement.
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Carcinogenesis, P.O. Box 389, Smithville, TX 78957.
Received 6/ 9/95. Accepted 8/ 4/95.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Khilko, P. Bourne, Qi Yang, and Ping Tang Mismatch Repair Genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 May Not Play an Essential Role in Breast Carcinogenesis International Journal of Surgical Pathology, July 1, 2007; 15(3): 233 - 241. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Hwang, S. DeVries, K. L. Chew, D. H. Moore II, K. Kerlikowske, A. Thor, B.-M. Ljung, and F. M. Waldman Patterns of Chromosomal Alterations in Breast Ductal Carcinoma In situ Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 10(15): 5160 - 5167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Wild, A. Reichle, R. Andreesen, G. Rockelein, W. Dietmaier, J. Ruschoff, H. Blaszyk, F. Hofstadter, and A. Hartmann Microsatellite Instability Predicts Poor Short-Term Survival in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer after High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 10(2): 556 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Osin, Y-J. Lu, J. Stone, T. Crook, R. S. Houlston, M. Gasco, B. A. Gusterson, and J. Shipley Distinct Genetic and Epigenetic Changes in Medullary Breast Cancer International Journal of Surgical Pathology, July 1, 2003; 11(3): 153 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Bednarek, C. L. Keck-Waggoner, R. L. Daniel, K. J. Laflin, P. L. Bergsagel, K. Kiguchi, A. J. Brenner, and C. M. Aldaz WWOX, the FRA16D Gene, Behaves as a Suppressor of Tumor Growth Cancer Res., November 1, 2001; 61(22): 8068 - 8073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Stomper, C. C. Stewart, and D. L. Stoler Stereotactic Core Biopsy Breast and Blood Cell By-products: A Source of Material for Molecular Genetics Research-Initial Experience Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 881 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. GOEPFERT, M. MCCARTHY, F. S. KITTRELL, C. STEPHENS, R. L. ULLRICH, B. R. BRINKLEY, and D. MEDINA Progesterone facilitates chromosome instability (aneuploidy) in p53 null normal mammary epithelial cells FASEB J, November 1, 2000; 14(14): 2221 - 2229. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Bednarek, K. J. Laflin, R. L. Daniel, Q. Liao, K. A. Hawkins, and C. M. Aldaz WWOX, a Novel WW Domain-containing Protein Mapping to Human Chromosome 16q23.3-24.1, a Region Frequently Affected in Breast Cancer Cancer Res., April 1, 2000; 60(8): 2140 - 2145. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Waldman, S. DeVries, K. L. Chew, D. H. Moore II, K. Kerlikowske, and B.-M. Ljung Chromosomal Alterations in Ductal Carcinomas In Situ and Their In Situ Recurrences J Natl Cancer Inst, February 16, 2000; 92(4): 313 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Cui, H. Feiner, Z. Lin, and H. Li Multiplex Genotype Analysis of Invasive Carcinoma and Accompanying Proliferative Lesions Microdissected from Breast Tissue J. Mol. Diagn., February 1, 2000; 2(1): 29 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Anbazhagan, H. Fujii, and E. Gabrielson Microsatellite Instability Is Uncommon in Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 1999; 5(4): 839 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |