| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Groningen Institute for Drug Studies, Department of Hematology, University of Groningen, Bloemsingel 10, 9712 KZ Groningen, the Netherlands [G. d. H., B. D., W. N.], and Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany [C. E., M. L.]
In this study, we determined in vivo interactions between hemopoietic growth factors and etoposide (VP-16) to assess whether normal blood cell production could be maintained during chemotherapy if hemopoietic growth factors were simultaneously administered. Groups of mice were treated for 7 consecutive days with four different doses of VP-16 in combination with three different doses of erythropoietin (EPO) or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). In total, 12 combinations of VP-16 plus EPO and 12 combinations of VP-16 plus G-CSF were thus evaluated. Intricate dose-response surfaces of the effects of the different treatments on colony-forming units-erythroid, reticulocytes, hematocrit, colony-forming units-granulocyte/macrophage, and absolute neutrophil count were obtained, which revealed that: (a) simultaneous EPO administration was able to maintain reticulocyte production and to protect mice from VP-16 induced anemia; (b) simultaneous G-CSF administration was able to maintain granulocyte production and to protect mice from VP-16 induced neutropenia; (c) VP-16 dose escalation was feasible when EPO or G-CSF were simultaneously administered; and (d) no increased myelotoxicity on erythroid or granuloid progenitors was observed when EPO or G-CSF was simultaneously administered with VP-16. These results suggest that in vivo either individual hemopoietic progenitors can become resistant against VP-16-induced cell death by appropriate simultaneous growth factor administration or that the loss of overall cell amplification, induced by VP-16, can be compensated by extra amplification of surviving progenitors. Furthermore, these data indicate that a strict separation in time of cytostatic drug and growth factor treatment is not necessarily the optimal schedule with respect to the reduction of hemotoxicity.
1 This work was partially sponsored by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Lo 342-5/1).
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.
Received 8/ 9/94. Accepted 11/11/94.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Villunger, L. A. O'Reilly, N. Holler, J. Adams, and A. Strasser FAS Ligand, Bcl-2, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, and p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase: Regulators of Distinct Cell Death and Survival Pathways in Granulocytes J. Exp. Med., September 5, 2000; 192(5): 647 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Roeder, G. de Haan, C. Engel, W. Nijhof, B. Dontje, and M. Loeffler Interactions of Erythropoietin, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, Stem Cell Factor, and Interleukin-11 on Murine Hematopoiesis During Simultaneous Administration Blood, May 1, 1998; 91(9): 3222 - 3229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |