Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  2010 Workshops
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 55, 5811s-5816s, December 1, 1995]
© 1995 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberson, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Buchsbaum, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberson, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Buchsbaum, D. J.

Reconciliation of Tumor Dose Response to External Beam Radiotherapy versus Radioimmunotherapy with 131Iodine-labeled Antibody for a Colon Cancer Model1

Peter L. Roberson2 and Donald J. Buchsbaum

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0010 [P. L. R.], and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233-6832 [D. J. B.]

Reported doses of external beam radiotherapy and radioimmunotherapy (RIT) to produce equivalent therapeutic effects are inconsistent, with many proposed causes. Calculations of effective dose were performed for the case of LS174T human colon cancer xenografts, where a 60Co single fraction exposure (6 Gy) was matched with 131I-labeled 17-1A monoclonal antibody therapy (300 µCi injection, 19 ± 2 Gy using the Medical Internal Radiation Dose uniform isotropic model). Measured three-dimensional dose-rate distributions were used to form a time-dependent description of the dose-rate nonuniformity. Included in the calculation of RIT effective dose was energy loss, dose nonuniformity, dose-rate dependence, hypoxic fraction, and cell proliferation. The calculations assumed the linear quadratic model for cell survival with {alpha} = 0.3 Gy-1, {alpha}/ß = 15 to 25 Gy, and µ = 0.46 h-1. The biologically effective dose for the single fraction 60Co exposure was 7.4 to 8.4 Gy. Estimates of dose efficiency factors consecutively applied to the RIT dose estimate were: (a) energy loss external to the tumor (x0.85); (b) effect of dose nonuniformity on cell survival (x0.65); and (c) effect of correlation of dose nonuniformity with cell proliferation rate (x1.08). The resulting effective dose for RIT was 11.4 Gy for tumor regrowth. This analysis substantially reconciles external beam radiotherapy/RIT dose-response results for this tumor model to within experimental uncertainties.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. M. Sharkey and D. M. Goldenberg
Targeted Therapy of Cancer: New Prospects for Antibodies and Immunoconjugates
CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2006; 56(4): 226 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association for Cancer Research.