Cancer Research AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008  Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 55, 5852s-5856s, December 1, 1995]
© 1995 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ceriani, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ceriani, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, J. A.

Biological Activity of Two Humanized Antibodies against Two Different Breast Cancer Antigens and Comparison to Their Original Murine Forms1

Roberto L. Ceriani2, Edward W. Blank, Joseph R. Couto and Jerry A. Peterson

Cancer Research Fund of Contra Costa, Walnut Creek, California 94596

We have humanized two monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), hu-BrE-3 and hu-Mc3, that are bound to two different antigens of the breast epithelial cell. They bind to the breast epithelial mucin (Mr 400,000) and the BA46 antigen (Mr 46,000). They could participate in a joint radioimmunotherapy strategy administering repeated or fractionated dosages, where increased irradiation could be delivered by their simultaneous administration.

Both antibodies, hu-BrE-3 and hu-Mc3, had similar reactivity to their antigens and similar binding affinity as those of their original murine forms. However, because humanized MoAbs could have different pharmacokinetic and radioimmunotherapeutic characteristics than their original murine forms, the experimental biodistribution in vivo of both of these two humanized anti-breast tumor MoAbs was compared to their original murine forms. Biodistributions in immunodeficient mice grafted with transplantable human breast tumors, both after radioiodination and 111In labeling via 1-p-isothiocyanatobenzyl-methyl-diethylene-triaminepentaacetic acid (MXDTPA), demonstrated comparable tumor:normal tissue ratios for the humanized and murine forms. In radioimmunotherapy, the humanized forms for both MoAbs showed also similar tumoricidal activity as that of the original murine MoAbs. These results show that the new humanized forms are amenable to conjugation and radioisotope labeling without loss of biological activity. Furthermore, they demonstrate that these engineered molecules kept intact, both qualitatively and quantitatively, their binding ability, pharmacokinetics, and radioimmunotherapeutic characteristics after the humanization process.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association for Cancer Research.