| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Miami, School of Medicine, and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center [D. B-B., D. K., T. J. L.] and V.A. Hospital [C. J. W., N. S.], Miami, Florida 33101
Preferential retention and cytotoxicity of Rhodamine-123 (Rho-123) was originally reported in a number of carcinoma cell types isolated from a variety of tissues as compared to normal epithelial cells from a limited number of other tissues. In the present study, we have examined Rho-123 selectivity in normal and tumor cell lines isolated from the same tissue source, i.e., human breast. We found that: (a) in matched pairs of normal and carcinoma breast cells, Rho-123 displays no preferential retention in either cell type; (b) there is no preferential toxicity in carcinoma as compared to normal breast cells; in fact, one of the carcinoma cell lines (MDA-MB231) shows moderate resistance to this dye; (c) allof the human breast cell lines do not express P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance; (d) the normal monkey kidney epithelial cell line CV-1, which was originally used as a model to demonstrate the relative resistance of normal epithelial cells to this drug, is found to express high levels of the mdr-1 gene, is resistant to other multidrug-resistant drugs (taxol and vinblastine), and its resistance to Rho-123 as well as decreased Rho-123 retention can be reversed by verapamil; and (e) taxol and vinblastine are found to block increased Rho-123 efflux in CV-1 cells. Thus, overall the data suggest that preferential retention and cytotoxicity of Rho-123 in carcinoma versus normal epithelial cells is related to the differential expression of the mdr-1 gene.
1 Supported in part by USPHS NIH Grant CA 37109 and a national V.A. grant.
2 Visiting scientist on leave from the Institut de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France.
3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Miami, School of Medicine (R-124), P.O. Box 016960, Miami, FL 33101.
Received 1/11/95. Accepted 3/ 3/95.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Miller, M. Wang, J. Gralow, M. Dickler, M. Cobleigh, E. A. Perez, T. Shenkier, D. Cella, and N. E. Davidson Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab versus Paclitaxel Alone for Metastatic Breast Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., December 27, 2007; 357(26): 2666 - 2676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Sarver, W. A. Klis, J. P. Byers, and P. W. Erhardt Microplate Screening of the Differential Effects of Test Agents on Hoechst 33342, Rhodamine 123, and Rhodamine 6G Accumulation in Breast Cancer Cells that Overexpress P-Glycoprotein J Biomol Screen, February 1, 2002; 7(1): 29 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Y. LIU, T.-Y. HAN, A. E. GIULIANO, and M. C. CABOT Ceramide glycosylation potentiates cellular multidrug resistance FASEB J, March 1, 2001; 15(3): 719 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |